Talk:Fish Wars

Treaty

Although most sources (and related Wikipedia articles) cite the Point No Point Treaty as the applicable treaty here, it seems like the so-called Treaty with the Nisqually, Puyallup, Etc. is more relevant (at least as it concerns Nisqually fishermen like Billy Frank, Jr.). Does anyone more knowledgeable than I am have an opinion on this? Kafziel ^{Complaint Department: Please take a number} 17:32, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Is this reliable information?--Sharkbait27 (talk) 20:54, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: HIST 121 - U.S. History since 1877

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 February 2023 and 18 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tystrehlow, Wlynch87 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Jlpaulsen22, I'm only doing this for my history class.

— Assignment last updated by FutureTeacher2026 (talk) 15:57, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Outline for Contributions to Article

Lead

The Fish Wars were a series of civil disobedience protests in the pacific northwest during the 1960s and '70s in which Native American tribes around the Puget Sound pressured the U.S. government to recognize fishing rights granted by the Treaty of Medicine Creek. They protested by continuing to fish on their land while risking charges being pressed against them.

Article body

In 1916, the city of Tacoma donated 60,000 acres of land to the United States Army to build Fort Lewis. Two-thirds of the land came from the Nisqually reservation, including several miles of the Nisqually River. On the local level, at Frank’s Landing on the Nisqually River, court cases proceeded on Native Americans rights to the land as well as a dramatic and decisive battles where a community sought to preserve some of his traditional fishing areas. One of the residents of the reservation, Willy Frank Sr., bought a six-acre plot on the Nisqually River from Winthrop "Wint" Humphrey Bennett for $50 and moved his family to what would eventually be known as "Frank's Landing." For this act, Willy Frank Sr. bestowed upon Winthrop the title of 'White Eagle.'

In 1937, a federal court granted a petition to prevent the state of Washington from interfering with native fishing rights, but there was no enforcement of that decision. Local authorities continued to police the water and game wardens issued citations and made arrests.

In the 1940s and 1950s the Nisqually Tribe were restricted to fishing in ever-shrinking areas or risked being arrested or having their gear confiscated and held for months, which would ruin their chances of making a living. The only truly safe place for the tribes to fish was on their reservations, where state officials had no jurisdiction.

In 1945, Willy Frank's 14-year-old son, Billy Frank, Jr., was arrested for fishing with a net. This would prove to be the first of many confrontations between the younger Frank and state authorities. Before selling 'Frank's Landing,' to Will Frank Sr., Winthrop Bennett would disallow authorities to trespass through his land as they attempted to cite and remove Nisqually nets, requiring a warrant. In such time as it took to acquire a warrant, Winthrop would warn the Nisqually to remove their nets. And for this act of aiding the Nisqually and Willy Frank Sr., Fort Lewis condemned the Bennett property for which Winthrop, his two sons John and Sam along with his daughter Sissy left the Nisqually River Valley, friends, and neighbors, which included the Bragets and Brown families.

By the early 1960s, state enforcement officials openly ignored the ruling and made numerous arrests, as well as confiscated boats and fishing equipment. This bleak situation in the early 1960s grew even worse in 1963 when Walter Neubrech, the head of the enforcement division of the Department of Game, provided a clear example of the negative image of Native Americans being put forward in the media. A Seattle Times article portrayed natives as the enemy in no uncertain terms. With a headline titled “Skagits on the Warpath?” the article printed claims by Neubrech that his enforcement officers had been shot at and threatened, and quoted him as saying, “They [the Indians] have been crowding us.” It reported a December incident in which two Native Americans had been caught illegally fishing on the Skagit River, having caught both steelhead and salmon in their 150-foot net.

References

Demonstrations

Some native fishermen refused to obtain licenses or obey fish and game restrictions on certain fisheries, eventually setting up encampments along the shore illegal from the state's perspective but within the federal law and the 1854 Treaty of Medicine Creek. This Treaty gave the US government Native land in exchange for financial compensation, education, basic healthcare, and the right to fishing and harvesting the fish on their common territory. This treaty was a way for the Nation to continue expanding west and settling on new land. Often times, the terms of this treaty were not upheld and natives were not given the benefits they agreed too, and some were forced off their ancestral land and put on government regulated reservations.

In 1963, the first fish-in was held at Frank's Landing down stream from the Nisqually Reservation, with the intent to protest the failure to follow through with the terms of the Treaty of Medicine Creek. By the end of the 1960s, Frank's Landing previously owned by Winthrop Humphrey Bennett as a ferry crossing under the name 'Bennett's Landing,' now owned by Billy Frank, Jr., had become a haven for unlicensed "fish-ins" in which, despite numerous arrests and convictions, fishermen would return to their fishing ground time and again, allowing themselves to be re-arrested for asserting their treaty rights. The fish-ins spread throughout Washington and Oregon.

By 1964, the dispute over fishing rights began to receive national media attention. Several celebrities took up the cause, including Marlon Brando, Buffy Sainte-Marie, and Dick Gregory. Brando was arrested in March 1964 for taking two steelhead trout as part of a protest with the Puyallup tribe. The movement also brought in other Native groups from outside the region, such as the National Indian Youth Council and Hank Adams from the Quinault Reservation.

In an attempt to calm the situation from being in the media spotlight surrounding the fish-ins, the State took action. Walter Neubrech, who was the Chief of the Enforcement Division of the Department of Game, released a press release in which he explained the small number of Native Americans involved in the protests. He stated in his press release that only 178 Indians were fishing beyond reservation boundaries in violation of state laws, which constituted less than 1% of the Indian population in the state of 18,000. Neubrech then said, “It has been very difficult for a law enforcement agency to maintain dignity and proper respect for the laws of the state of Washington in view of the tremendous amount of public attention that has been directed towards this Indian fishery off their reservation.” He then claimed the drop in fish population on the Puyallup River was solely due to the unrestricted commercial fishing practices of "three Indian brothers." Neubrech also warned the public in his press release the of the possibility of Indians resorting to hunting deer and elk on national forest land. Neubrech final claim in his press release was that the Indian community is divided into "good" and "bad," with him saying, "A fair number [of Native Americans] fish commercially during established seasons in keeping with conservation laws. A large majority of the Indian people are gainfully employed and support their families in various trades and professions other than fishing.”

Not all of the actions were nonviolent. In September 1970, Puyallup fishermen on boats, armed with rifles, challenged police and fired warning shots when officials approached their nets. A fish-in leader named Many Dog Hides was quoted as saying, "It's a sad thing we have to bring guns out. But we are a dying people and have to fight for survival, as we have done for about 500 years." One protester threw a fire bomb onto a bridge to slow the game officials' advance, but police eventually raided the boats and camps and forcefully broke up the demonstrators with tear gas and clubs.

Finally, the U.S. federal government intervened, suing the state of Washington for failure to uphold its treaty agreement.

References

Bibliography

• 1)Shreve, Bradley G. “‘From Time Immemorial’: The Fish-in Movement and the Rise of Intertribal Activism.” Pacific Historical Review, vol. 78, no. 3, 2009, pp. 403–34. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.1525/phr.2009.78.3.403. Accessed 17 Mar. 2023.
  • This article goes over the fish in movement and starts talking about the roots of modern intertribal activism along with how native individuals are apart of this.
• 2)The - Austrian-Library.s3-Website-Us-East-1.Amazonaws.com. http://austrian-library.s3-website-us-east-1.amazonaws.com/journals/lar/pdfs/3_1/3_1_6.pdf.
  • "The Last Indian War" gives an overview of the Native Americans protest against the American government.
  • Written by Janet McCloud; gives Native Americans point of view. The writing fully explains both sides of the conflict.
• 3)Langston, Donna Hightower. “American Indian Women’s Activism in the 1960s and 1970s.” Hypatia, vol. 18, no. 2, 2003, pp. 114–32. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3811016. Accessed 17 Mar. 2023.
  • This focuses on the role of women for the fish in movement and how female elders play a very crucial role in all of it,
• “The Fish-in Protests at Franks Landing.” The Fish-in Protests at Franks Landing - Seattle Civil Rights and Labor History Project, https://depts.washington.edu/civilr/fish-ins.htm.
  • This article talks about the fish in protests at franks landing and how many well-known activist groups and concerned individuals joined the struggle which featured the confrontational drama of the Native American “fish-in” protests.
• “Treaty of Medicine Creek.” Goia, https://goia.wa.gov/tribal-government/treaty-medicine-creek-1854.
  • This article talks about the government making a treaty with many Native Americans for financial compensation and other benefits, however often these terms were not upheld by the government

Tystrehlow (talk) 17:21, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

References