Talk:Firuz Shah Suri

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Low-importance).

India: Delhi Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Delhi (assessed as Low-importance).

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 17:56, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:INDIA Banner/Delhi Addition

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag ^TALK2ME 15:49, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted because the other site has almost certainly copied Wikipedia, not vice versa. --Folantin (talk) 19:46, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Based on what? Two things: User:Siddiqui is serial copyright violator and the only reason I found this page is because I was working on his contributor copyright investigation here. Secondly, that website has a copyright notice 2003-2005 at the bottom, which would be unusual if it did not exist until 2006. If you have any evidence which indicates this is reverse copyvio please present it, but looking at what we have now this should be deleted. Yoenit (talk) 19:55, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, on second thoughts you may have a point... I'm here because I reacted to your edit summary to Ismail Shah Suri. I remember rewriting almost all of that article from a book, so I imagined I was being accused of copyvio. On the other hand, it does look highly plausible that Siddiqui lifted material from that site, so I'll withdraw my objection - although I think rewriting the article from scratch would be better than outright deletion. Cheers. --Folantin (talk) 20:02, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think deepthi.com copied Wikipedia. The Wikipedia article grew organically; example: [1]. Quarl ^(talk) 01:00, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]