Talk:First Ostend Raid

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the First Ostend Raid article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Maritime / British / European / French / German / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War I task force

Belgium Low‑importance

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

First Ostend Raid has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 9, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed

Successful good article nomination

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of October 9, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: yes, prose is excellent

2. Factually accurate?: article is well-referenced

3. Broad in coverage?: it covers all major points well

4. Neutral point of view?: there is no problem with POV

5. Article stability? article is free of any edit-warring or reversions

6. Images?: are all free or have fair-use rationales

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. — It is a pleasure to promote this quality article Argos'Dad 00:15, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]