Jump to content

Talk:First ladies and gentlemen of Kansas

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:First Ladies and Partners of California which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 14:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 December 2022

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. While Scope creep was the editor carrying out the moves, I find that there is a consensus to move to the proposed title. Noting the exchange at the end of the discussion, this closure does not preclude further possible moves to 'List of...' titles if necessary. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 00:22, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


– Seems like MOS:JOBTITLES and WP:NCCAPS apply here. Articles like First Lady of the United States are acceptable because the singular refers to a formal title. But all of these are plural and technically refer to a description (as is the case with List of first ladies of the United States). Woko Sapien (talk) 15:44, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Which would you like to do? P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'r there 23:47, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Good catch. I guess Second ladies of India (2a) makes more sense as it makes the fewest changes. The article can be changed to 2b later when that becomes necessary. Woko Sapien (talk) 15:42, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 As you wish, 2a has been added to the list. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'r there 16:03, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Woko Sapien: 9 supports and one oppose. Strong consensus for move. scope_creepTalk 22:20, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Move completed apart from last entry

[edit]

@Woko Sapien: I've moved per instructions. I've removed the requested move tags right up until. First ladies of Hawaii. For some reason I couldn't move First Ladies and Gentlemen of the Philippines. You will need to take it to WP:RM where admin can look. I don't know whats up for it. You will need to check the leads and makes sure the intro is ok. scope_creepTalk 23:13, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Woko Sapien: They're is 133 redirects [[1]] that will need to be addressed. I don't know what you want to do with them. scope_creepTalk 23:20, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Typically double redirects are resolved in the discussion closure process, or they're fixed by bots later on. Woko Sapien (talk) 15:21, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't automatically happen when the WP:Page mover incompetently suppresses redirects. – wbm1058 (talk) 16:23, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh jeez, what a mess! Please let me know if there's anything I can do to help untangle this. Woko Sapien (talk) 17:02, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Scope creep why did you suppress the redirect creation though? and remember to close the discussion. – robertsky (talk) 23:36, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Page swapped the Philippines article. – robertsky (talk) 23:37, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Paine Ellsworth, let me know if I have missed out any redirects. Have followed up with the Talk page redirects creation. – robertsky (talk) 06:51, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
To editor ­robertsky: thank you very much for your follow up! Get a chance, check out one or two of the redirects and talk pages, as I made some small improvements. Thanks again! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'r there 15:13, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]