Talk:First Battle of Newbury/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 15:59, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

1. Day, Jon (2007). Gloucester & Newbury 1643: The Turning Point of the Civil War the ISBN is incorrect
2. Worden, Blair (2009). The English Civil Wars, 1640-1660. Phoenix Sme with this one the ISBN needs checking
3. Not a requirement for GA if if going any further the cities of publication needs adding to the books.
4. Some links need disambiguating River Avon, Severn Valley, Upton

A good read just some minor points that keep if from GA well done. Jim Sweeney (talk) 16:30, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Passed GA

Jim Sweeney (talk) 16:33, 20 June 2011 (UTC)