Talk:First Battle of Maryang-san/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: AustralianRupert (talk) 04:31, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status. AustralianRupert (talk) 04:31, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
Progression
[edit]- Version of the article when originally reviewed: [1]
- Version of the article when review was closed: [2]
Technical review
[edit]- a (Disambiguations): b (Linkrot) c (Alt text)
- no dabs,
- ext links work,
- alt text is present.
Criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- I have fixed a few typos, but there are a couple of things I couldn't fix (per below)
- Thanks, they look good. Anotherclown (talk) 22:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- in the Prelude, this seems to be missing something: "with this formation which would bear the brunt of the fighting";
- Done. Anotherclown (talk) 22:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- in the Prelude, tense issue ("would be held", and "provided") "would be held in reserve and also provided a battalion to each of the other brigades as reinforcements";
- Done. Anotherclown (talk) 22:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- in the Prelude "regiments" should be wikilinked on first mention, currently I think it is on the second;
- Done. Anotherclown (talk) 22:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- "first phase by 1KOSB with the 1KSLI and 3RAR in support" (slight inconsistency in use of definate article "the");
- Done. Anotherclown (talk) 22:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- "counter-attack" and "counterattack";
- Done. Anotherclown (talk) 22:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- wikilink "counter-battery fire";
- Done. Anotherclown (talk) 22:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- not sure about this (and other examples of similar): "C and B Company" (shouldn't it be "C and B Companies" - plural?);
- Done. Anotherclown (talk) 22:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- in the Battle section, wikilink "section" ("and a section of medium machine-guns");
- Done. Anotherclown (talk) 22:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- "To be sure, the assault was being" (to be sure sounds a little informal);
- Done. Anotherclown (talk) 22:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- in the Fall of Maryang San section, this could be tighter: "were unable to be in position in time to commence the attack as planned";
- Done. Anotherclown (talk) 22:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- "B Company—commanded by Captain Henry Nicholls—lead off shrouded in the heavy mist" ("led" off);
- Done. Anotherclown (talk) 22:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- "while undoubtedly a large number had also been wounded" (not sure about this, perhaps it would be better to use more subtle language, e.g. "while the Australians believed that a large number of Chinese had also been wounded");
- Done. Anotherclown (talk) 22:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- "northwest of the summit" (I think this should be "north-west of the summit");
- Done. Anotherclown (talk) 22:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- not sure about this "and to run ammunition forward at great risk" (probably remove "at great risk");
- Done. Anotherclown (talk) 22:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- not sure about the wording here: "The Australians had won an impressive victory" (perhaps just say "The Australians had been victorious...")
- Done. Anotherclown (talk) 22:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- in the Aftermath, this is confusing: "with 283 killed by body count alone and another 50 captured" (it implies that someone can be killed by body count, when what you mean is that it was a method used to determine how many were killed);
- Done. Anotherclown (talk) 22:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- in the Aftermath "Distinguished Service Order" might be overlinked (it is already linked in a previous section);
- Done. Anotherclown (talk) 22:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- in the Aftermath, "During the battle, the logistic system proved robust enough" (whose logistic system?);
- Done. Anotherclown (talk) 22:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- in the Aftermath, "Through out the operation" (I think this should be "Throughout the operation" - the Macquarie dictionary lists "throughout");
- Done. Anotherclown (talk) 22:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- in the Aftermath, "during which Private Bill Speakman was awarded the Victoria Cross" (I suggest rewording this slightly. Speakman probably wasn't awarded the VC during the fighting, but for the fighting);
- Done. Anotherclown (talk) 22:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- I have fixed a few typos, but there are a couple of things I couldn't fix (per below)
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- No issues.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- No issues.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
- No issues.
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No issues.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned): b (Is illustrated with appropriate images): c (non-free images have fair use rationales): d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain:
- "File:Korean porters Nov 1951 (AWM HOBJ2563).jpg" - is missing description information on the image description page,
- Done. Anotherclown (talk) 22:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- "File:Australian casualties Operation Commando Oct 1951 (AWM HOBJ2443).jpg" - same as above (this is on Commons), so you will need to edit the Commons page, or I can do this for you (I have a Commons account), if you tell me what you want added;
- Done. Anotherclown (talk) 22:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- if you are considering taking this to FA, I would suggest replacing the non-free map if possible, although it seems okay for GA and the searches I did, didn't locate any free maps to replace it with.
- Ack, I won't take it to FA but will look around for one. Anotherclown (talk) 22:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- "File:Korean porters Nov 1951 (AWM HOBJ2563).jpg" - is missing description information on the image description page,
- Overall:
- a Pass/Fail:
- A couple of minor prose issues to deal with per above, but otherwise looks fine to me. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 09:38, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
- All done now, thanks again for reviewing. Anotherclown (talk) 22:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- No worries, looks good. AustralianRupert (talk) 03:20, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
- All done now, thanks again for reviewing. Anotherclown (talk) 22:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- A couple of minor prose issues to deal with per above, but otherwise looks fine to me. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 09:38, 5 May 2011 (UTC)