Talk:Fire making

Scouting Low‑importance

	Scouting portal Fire making is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ScoutingWikipedia:WikiProject ScoutingTemplate:WikiProject ScoutingScouting
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Backpacking (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Backpacking, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BackpackingWikipedia:WikiProject BackpackingTemplate:WikiProject BackpackingBackpacking

Great pic

This is the only article I've ever seen on wikipedia that used an animation. Way to go whoever threw that up there! -Shaggorama 04:08, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's weirding me out.64.81.161.245

hahaha! excellent! 86.135.164.200 20:38, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently its been removed :( Saktoth (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:12, 14 March 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Firecraft merge

support --Gadget850 ( Ed) 14:25, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
support --DevOhm ^Talk 09:15, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You should put in the article "How Early Man Made Fire " —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.10.142.135 (talk) 21:28, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Who uses the term Firecraft besides writers of survival manuals? Kortoso (talk) 20:54, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Repeating

Modern methods of making fire has "Electric" twice. Any reason for that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.69.228.17 (talk) 14:49, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Animals

Animals do not make fire, but many animals know what fire is and that it is dangerous and should be fleed from. Some predatory animals know that fire creates rich pickings, and will follow fire once started. Tabletop (talk) 06:13, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is a hawk/kite in Australia that is reputed to pick up burning coals from wildfires and spread them about, in order to make animals flea so it might catch them, and also to pick among the remains of dead animals. Try as i might, i cannot find ANY source for this info though i recall seeing it in a documentary. This youtube video is as close as i can get: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_qVrMDo8DE —Preceding unsigned comment added by Saktoth (talk • contribs) 05:15, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rename

How about we rename this article "methods of making fire" or something similar? It would take away some of the connotations of it being a how-to page, instead devoting it to the known methods of starting fires. Jaimeastorga2000 (talk) 19:03, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Fire making"? "Fire starting"? "Fire ignition?" Will Beback talk 07:24, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removed product brand reference

This line read like a plug for a product rather then providing any real useful information. "One such device is known as the Aurora Fire Starter. This device uses a ferrocerium rod doped with high amounts of magnesium and also has a built-in striking blade." So I change it to provide a note about device with built in scrapers and one hand operation. Sledder (talk) 03:59, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox

Started a "firecraft" navbox at User:Steveprutz/firemaking. Any suggestions would be appreciated. StevePrutz (talk) 19:13, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seems you're on the right track. Kortoso (talk) 23:32, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Any thoughts about separating "Bow Drill" from "Hand Drill"? Historically, we know that hand drills for fire making were much more common (in fact nearly universal) than bow drills, which were actually only known to a handful of primitive cultures. The bowdrill's current popularity, of course, is due to its ease of use and its promotion among certain survivalist circles. But adherence to that bias is producing a skewed perspective of history. Kortoso (talk) 21:46, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Methods by historical era"

Great idea for a topic, but the sub-topics do not follow that pattern. And it forces the narrative into unfounded conclusions, namely "the oldest firemaking technique" which is patently unprovable, and may lead others to mistaken conclusions. May I suggest simply listing different techniques and not pretending that they are in historical order? Kortoso (talk) 23:29, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Pyromania"

I don't believe this belongs in here as a x-reference. It's a mental disorder. Why would people visiting this article need that link? Kortoso (talk) 18:27, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Which came first: friction or percussion?

I think that finding reliable sources that point to one or the other, would greatly enhance this article. Who's game? Something to start with: http://members.societe-jersiaise.org/whitsco/hist2.htm

Friction fire-making seems widespread, although percussion fire-making could have accompanied stone tool-making. Kortoso (talk) 17:09, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Found an article by Dr Cordain from which I might "mine" some references:

http://thepaleodiet.com/ancestral-fire-production-implications-contemporary-paleo-diets/ Kortoso (talk) 19:46, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Neandertals

We conclude that Middle Paleolithic Neandertals did not have to wait for lightning strikes, meteorite falls, volcanoes, or spontaneous combustion: they had the ability to make, conserve, and transport fires during successive occupations or at different sites, like ethnographically documented recent hunter-gatherers, a pattern comparable to that documented in the Upper Paleolithic. http://www.pnas.org/content/108/13/5209.full Kortoso (talk) 20:00, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Earliest hand fire drill

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-19168047 When: The journal reports that the artefacts are almost 8,000 years old Where: Sha'ar HaGolan http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0042213 "We suggest that these objects were components of fire drills and consider them the earliest evidence of a complex technology of fire ignition, which incorporates the cylindrical objects in the role of matches." NOPE. These are all made of clay or stone. Kortoso (talk) 21:11, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pump drill

A better cite for this claim: "The Iroquois are unique in America and perhaps in the world in making fire with the pump drill." Fire-making Apparatus in the United States National Museum; Walter Hough, 1890 Kortoso (talk) 16:20, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Examples from around the world

Listed at Talk:Bow drill#Hand Fire Drill.John_Abbe (talk) 13:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Firemaking is a Core Human Skill

I suggest this topic, the specific skill and means/method to start a fire, is far more than just a part of Scouting or Bushcraft (even though I've taught firemaking for decades in those fields). Starting a fire is essential to human life (eating, warmth, clean water, etc.), human development, human culture, and such for thousands of years. There is so much material for this simple topic that its almost overwhelming.

I propose we focus solely on the skill itself and where possible direct readers to sub-topic Wiki pages that detail each method, or historical, cultural, and other aspects .Sweerek (talk) 14:47, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 June 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. (non-admin closure) TonyBallioni (talk) 14:06, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Firelighting → Fire making – WP:COMMONNAME: fire making, fire lighting and fire craft appear in the lead sentence. Firelighting doesn't appear even once in the body of the article. The article was renamed to firelighting years ago by someone who wanted to make the article title match the category name. There was no need for that, and if there was the category should have been renamed rather than violating WP:COMMONNAME on the article title. Srleffler (talk) 02:55, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support – The logic seems sound, and your suggested name seems to fit better. ngrams shows that "fire making" is the most popular term of the three by far. Regular Google searches (with quotation marks) also put "fire making" (447k results) slightly ahead of "fire lighting" (409k). ("Firelighting", without any space in between, falls below both terms using both methods.) V2Blast (talk) 08:40, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fire making. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130801164012/http://rk19-bielefeld-mitte.de/survival/survival/09.htm to http://rk19-bielefeld-mitte.de/survival/survival/09.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:02, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Spindle (fire making)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Spindle (fire making). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:37, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge from Fire starter

The article Fire starter is (barring the first-sentence dictionary definition) a one-paragraph stub about a particular kind of fire starter used by mountain climbers and hikers. I don't think that merits its own article as the primary topic, considering the multifarious kinds of fire starters in existence.

Firestarter is a disambiguation page. If merged, I suggest the resulting {{R from move}} be listed for discussion to retarget it there. 94.21.78.76 (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the proposed merge. You don't need to list a redirect for discussion unless the change is controversial. Just change the redirect and see if anyone objects. I made some changes to firestarter to make actual fire-starting devices more prominent, as they should be.--Srleffler (talk) 18:19, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]