This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Ghosts In the Black was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 18 November 2015 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Firefly Role-Playing Game. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
Godfred99 created the article, has made most of the edits to it, and their only edits on Wikipedia ever are to articles about the Firefly RPG and its supplements. Now, none of that is necessarily a problem, except the article kind of looks like a product page advertising the system and its various supplements. (This might just be because of the frequent inclusion of promotional quotes, and the unnecessary subsections within the sections for each supplement... Oh yeah, and the wall of external links.)
I'd suggest removing some of the excessive/overly-long quotations from the designers, and cutting that wall of links down to just the few most relevant/necessary ones. V2Blast (talk) 22:46, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
