Talk:Firefly (franchise)

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Firefly task force.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Media franchises Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media franchises, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to media franchises on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Media franchisesWikipedia:WikiProject Media franchisesTemplate:WikiProject Media franchisesmedia franchise articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The name of this article is incorrect. I had thought the page had already been renamed, but it apparently fell off the screen after the last AfD. As the parent product of the franchise is serves as the name of the franchise (Highlander, Star Trek, Stargate, etc), this article should change to "Firefly (franchise)". The link to the discussion regarding the requested move can be found here - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 21:10, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note: Since no one's objected, I've moved it.--Aervanath (talk) 16:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 15:08, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The moving was discussed in the Article for Deletion log of the page and proved controversial. The page should be reverted to its original name until concensus can be reached.--Marcus Brute (talk) 15:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Link to AfD.--Marcus Brute (talk) 15:12, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Incorrect. While the moving was addressed in the XfD, it was not found to be an unfavorable choice, outside of yourself and a few others. Additionally, the link to the requested page move, and the discussion therein, went unanswered for the time period after which it was was performed. Silence is consent. You were silent, despite ample time to voice your opposition to the page move.

Lastly, this is an encyclopedia. Precedent notes that we follow other examples within the encyclopedia. Therefore, we use the name of the parent product of the franchise - Firefly. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 15:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move redux

Just two things to say:

I've dropped the moving admin a note to ask for their input.
I don't think any admin is going to accept that a move back to the original page name would be non-controversial given that it's been moved so recently via request. Trying to force a move via a speedy tag is unlikely to work.

That's me done for the moment. "Happy editing", as no one in their right mind should say. – The Parting Glass 15:28, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The moving admin's comment: if you'd like to move it back, file another move request at WP:RM; also, drop a note at the related WikiProjects (whatever they are) to try to get more input. If there's no consensus on which name to keep it at, I will move it back to the most recent stable name.--Aervanath (talk) 17:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Fireflyopeninglogo.JPG

The image File:Fireflyopeninglogo.JPG is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

File:Serenityship.jpg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --18:34, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I copied the rationale for that image from Firefly (TV series), as I think the same applies here. First time I've done anything with image rationales, so if that's wrong, please let me know. Jomasecu ^talk _contribs 20:17, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Livejournal commentary

I'm disappointed that there's no mention of the fact that Firefly is Joss Whedon's sexist, rapist fantasy. I trust this will be corrected soon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.37.226.155 (talk) 03:03, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unless an actual reliable source cares about it, then those overly-aggressive and temperamental critiques of the show won't ever make it onto the Wikipedia mainspace.~Zythe^{Talk to me!} 11:50, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Methinks I smell the author of that commentary here. As per Zythe, I wholeheartedly agree that unless a better citation appears than someone's cathartic blog about how a show is apparently inspiring/causing/advocating violence towards women, we should likely put a sock in it. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 14:01, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm disappointed that there's no mention of the fact that Joss whedon is quite literally God, just because someone wrote it on the internet once. I trust this will be corrected soon. --AdamField (talk) 23:48, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

helioforming

This was recently added to Stellar engineering:

In Firefly (TV series), set 500 years in the future, several Gas Giants are "Helioformed" to create viable suns for the surrounding planets and moons.

I don't remember any such thing, but I've only seen the TV/film – and in the Big Damn Movie all the inhabited planets seem to belong to a single star. Is helioforming mentioned in some other canonical work? —Tamfang (talk) 21:06, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Firefly (franchise). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071031064551/http://tv.msn.com:80/new-on-dvd/feature-article/default.aspx?news=281562 to http://tv.msn.com/new-on-dvd/feature-article/default.aspx?news=281562

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:37, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Firefly (franchise). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:48, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]