Talk:Fire and Blood (Game of Thrones)/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tea with toast (talk · contribs) 17:43, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   The writing style is not very well developed. There are many sentences and paragraphs that are short and choppy.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   The lead needs to be expanded.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Many more sources needed.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Many citations are needed, especially the "Production" section, which is unsourced.

   C. No original research:

   I cannot determine if original research has been performed since there are not enough sources to go on.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   The "Production" section needs to be expanded. The book should be given as a reference. I feel there should be more information given about the filming locations, other people involved (especially the director and other important film crew). The "Ratings" section is too short and needs more sources (and what does 18-49 represent?).

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   I feel that this article needs much work in order for it to get to "good article" status, so I will have to fail the article. I hope improvements can be made on it in the future, especially in regards to finding more sources and citing them properly. --Tea with toast (話) 18:18, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.