Talk:Fire Emblem: Path of Radiance/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
As an article on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps list, I am reviewing this article. This article has multiple problems to it, which includes:

Unreferenced parts of the article.
All of the images except the boxart and the gameplay should possibly be removed.

So if the problems aren't fixed in 7 days, I will delist it. GamerPro64 (talk) 19:37, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I added some references in the Fire Emblem section. Please specify any other areas you feel need references? I also moved the image showing the 3D graphics to where it belongs. I believe the images included are reasonable: The overall map helps describe the setting and is common in many articles; The bonus experience display and 3D graphics show features that were new to the series. With these minor fixes, I believe the article still meets good article status. Aether7 (talk) 16:58, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One example of a section needing refs is the "Settings" section. Also, I noticed that there's no "Develpment" section here. So there should be one. GamerPro64 (talk) 02:16, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I renamed the Presentation section to Development as it basically contains development information. It's still short, but I think it should be okay for GA. The Prince (talk) 20:31, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Second opinion comments

As GamerPro mentions, there are large swaths of the article that are unreferenced. Another critical issue I see is that the gameplay section is overly long and not very accessible for those not familiar with the series, ex. "The game retains the fundamental gameplay mechanics of the Fire Emblem series, such as the weapon triangle and grid-based battlefields." --I have no clue what that means. I think all the mini-sections can be cut down and merged together. As mentioned, the rest of the content is rather skimpy, but good enough for GA. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 15:58, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am displeased of the inactivity of fixing the problems in the article. And with that in mind, I am delisting it from GA - status. GamerPro64 (talk) 00:32, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]