Talk:Fiona pinnata

A fact from Fiona pinnata appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 December 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that although the nudibranch slug Fiona pinnata lives in open sea worldwide, it cannot swim?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/December.

Wikipedia

Gastropods High‑importance

	Gastropods portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gastropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of gastropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GastropodsWikipedia:WikiProject GastropodsTemplate:WikiProject GastropodsGastropods
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taxonomy: For all marine species, Project Gastropods uses the taxonomy in the online database WoRMS. When starting a new article, do not use sources of taxonomic information that predate the 2017 revision for all gastropod groups ("Revised Classification, Nomenclator and Typification of Gastropod and Monoplacophoran Families" by Philippe Bouchet & Jean-Pierre Rocroi, Bernhard Hausdorf, Andrzej Kaim, Yasunori Kano, Alexander Nützel, Pavel Parkhaev, Michael Schrödl and Ellen E. Strong in Malacologia, 2017, 61(1–2): 1–526.) (can be dowloaded at Researchgate.net), substituting the previous classification of 2005 Taxonomy of the Gastropoda (Bouchet & Rocroi, 2005). If you need help with any aspect of an article, please leave a note at the Project talk page.

Copyright problem removed

This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.

For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter, here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you. -- ascidian | talk-to-me 23:39, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at this Fiona pinnata article a few days ago and reviewed the copying issue. There is NO PROBLEM here; only a minimal amount of material was contributed by that single editor to this article, and that has all been edited away. This article seems fine in that respect. doncram (talk) 03:13, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that is true. Now it is fine. The material that was copied verbatim was removed back in April of 2009. Invertzoo (talk) 00:48, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]