Talk:Finsterwalder
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Finsterwalder article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Article name
[edit]A recent move of this article to Finsterwalder (Gmbh) made no sense to me, so I moved it back. The move was made with the edit summary "Confusion with other Finsterwalder (surname) articles", but then left Finsterwalder as a redirect to the new location. If the article were to be moved at all it should be moved to Finsterwalder GmbH, although that is currently a redirect to Finsterwalder. I can find no other use of (Gmbh) in brackets elsewhere. Why would we move it there? The existence of Finsterwalder (disambiguation) doesn't effect this at all, and can stand on its own. I have added a hatnote to that effect to this article, the most common usage. - Ahunt (talk) 13:45, 7 January 2015 (UTC)