Talk:Fine Line (Harry Styles album)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fine Line (Harry Styles album) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Pop music High‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rock music Mid‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 15 June 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Fine Line (album) to Fine Line (Harry Styles album). The result of the discussion was moved.

Watermelon Sugar

To the people who are in charge of this page, why is Watermelon Sugar counted as an official single when it:

1) has no music video

2) has no radio release date

3) was never stated to be a single by Harry or his team [in fact his fans considered it a buzz single as he never promoted it]

Froyo Fox126 (talk) 15:36, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Falling" release date

28 February 2020 is not the single's release date; it is the video's release date. Releasing a music video does not equate to a single release and/or release date. Not to mention, there has been no individual add for radio airplay, or individual song release on streaming platforms. livelikemusic talk! 20:55, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In that case Watermelon Sugar isn't a single either. Froyo Fox126 (talk) 23:30, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion and Tour

Though the only concert promotion was the One Night Only concert at The Forum, would it also be useful to include a section on the upcoming tour for 2021 along with updates from Harry and his team regarding the status of the tour situation? Tawras (talk) 20:18, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Rolling Stone 500

Wow. This is real. Piotr Jr. (talk) 21:38, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 June 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) WPscatter ^t/_c 03:30, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fine Line (album) → Fine Line (Harry Styles album) – To avoid confusion with Fine Line (Pasocom Music Club album). Doing this before moving as the latter album is very much less popular and I'm not sure of the proper way to disambiguate things like this CureComet (talk) 03:10, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support uncontroversial In ictu oculi (talk) 13:42, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Critical Reception

The “Tom Hull” quoted is not the same Tom Hull that produced the album. He shouldn’t be listed as a legitimate review when it’s just a random guy with a blog. Harrystylz (talk) 16:06, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]