Talk:Finding Bigfoot
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Finding Bigfoot article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Blatent Misinformation
[edit]The amount of slander and unverifiables should be corrected. This is mostly a overly subjective ad-hominem and blatently misinformation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Canadian Archain (talk • contribs) 18:02, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
What exactly is the above statement referring to? The poor usage of English makes it difficult to understand. 2605:E000:88C8:8000:CDD9:E5FE:20CC:C2D6 (talk) 14:37, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
This program is listed here as a documentary. It is anything BUT a documentary. The program is highly stylized and edited by the producers in such a way to make a mythological monster appear to be a realistic animal. If it were to be called anything, it should be called either a "Reality TV Show" or a "Mockumentary". But please, don't allow it to mislead people into believing that it is a documentary. March 6, 2015 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.19.78.68 (talk) 23:24, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi there. The show is definitely in the "documentary" format as it focuses on "documenting" what these people are doing. You can't claim that it's not a documentary simply because you don't agree with their beliefs. Style and relevancy have no bearing on whether or not the show is documentary.2605:E000:88C8:8000:CDD9:E5FE:20CC:C2D6 (talk) 14:35, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Documenting one's futility is allowed. There is no test for idiocy or even the existence of the subject. giggle (talk) 08:39, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
American vernacular
[edit]The claim is made that, "Over the course of the series, the team has introduced many new bigfoot related terms into the American vernacular." Is there any evidence that these terms have actually entered the American vernacular, beyond the show itself and associated marketing? 50.37.124.19 (talk) 18:31, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Finding Bigfoot - Cultural Impact?
[edit]I'm a little surprised that there is no mention of the fact that the team was parodied in an episode of South Park a couple of years ago. The "team" was brought to the town to investigate the legendary "Jewpacabra." I will leave it up to the editors of this particular page on if they want to add that bit of information. Aidensdaddy2k9 (talk) 01:20, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Show Cancelled
[edit]According to Ranae Holland's "Skeptical Scientist" public page on Facebook, Animal Planet has cancelled the show. The final episode which will be the 100th episode will air on May 27th 2018, to begin "Monster Week" on Animal Planet. She posted it on her page on April 25th, 2018, with a few links about the show's cancellation, and "rumor" about the travel channel possibly picking it up, but there has been no confirmation on that. Can whoever watches this page please update it in the article? https://www.facebook.com/TheSkepticalScientist/ Aidensdaddy2k9 (talk) 03:46, 3 May 2018 (UTC)