Talk:Final Fantasy XII/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

No Spoilers yet, please

I would like to request everyone to keep the article spoiler-free for at least a few months. I know that there is no Wikipedia rule such as "Don't post spoilers of a game before X days after release" but people might check Wikipedia for information about the game to decide whether or not to buy it, and they wouldn't want to stumble into a spoiler by accident.

So please be careful not to post any spoilers, warned or otherwise, thanks. --Waterchan 22:47, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

if there is a spoiler warning, i dont see any reason not to include spoilers... -Xornok 14:47, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Crown Prince?

Is Vayne actually a prince (crown or not)? He denied it in public and said that Emperor is an elected position early on(mid-tutorial section of the game), but a soldier called him highness.

(if he isn't, should that part of his description be changed or omitted, and if changed, what to? )

204.146.164.146 20:35, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

- In the game he says that though he is the son of the Emperor (hence the title highness) he is not a true ruler in the sense that he commands authority or dominion over any part of his father's kingdom. The soldier was simply calling him highness out of respect for his lineage from house Solidor.

(24.4.159.194 04:25, 16 December 2006 (UTC))

Ivalice Time Setting - Confirmed by the Creators?

I was wondering if we have an actual confirmation by the creators that XII is set after the events of Final Fantasy Tactics, and not before. The reference goes to a Gamespot article, however, doesn't seem to have a hard interview transcript of the questions asked--much less an answer from Yasumi Matsuno, the creator of the world of Ivalice!

Why do I bring this up? It's been nagging me for a while because of a brief part in Final Fantasy Tactics which comes up when Mustadio joins the party. From the game script hosted at Rpgamer:

AGRIAS: I hear a "lost civilization" is hidden under Goug... When St. Ajora was slive, airships were in the sky, and human robots in town. But time passed, technology was lost, and no one knows if it ever really existed.

MUSTADIO: But the civilization must have existed. Parts from many airships and machines are buried under Goug. Mechanics are the ones who restore the "past legacies".

Also note that the "Unexplored Lands" that you find in propositions include abandoned floating islands, and tell tales of an empire that was brought down by a mysterious plague. (SPOILERS for roughly 12-13 hours into FFXII here) Vaan's parents were taken out by plague, and the Emperor notes that he is dying of a mysterious illness. (end spoilers)

The descriptions of the "Unexplored Lands" rewards can be found here.

For these reasons, I'm inclined to believe that FFXII takes place not after, but BEFORE Final Fantasy Tactics. It would however be quite easy to assume that XII takes place after Tactics because of the advanced technology--especially if you didn't delve into the details of Final Fantasy Tactics. The "lost civilization" is never brought up as part of the main plot again. If you just went through the main plot once, you would probably dismiss or forget it (much less pick up on the mysterious plague). That is why I would like to find, if possible, an interview with Matsuno to confirm or deny my suspicion.

Cynders 20:07, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

There is no official quote from a Dev that says before or after. And whoever that anon person who keeps changing the information needs to stop. I agree w/ your arguments. Noah 02:41, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Rather, I keep changing it because I certain source from within the game (the Magick Pot bestiary entry, page 2, the Light of Kiltia), confirms, to any knowledgeable enough in Ivalice history, which way around the games go. --80.235.138.11 12:56, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Falling in Love?

If I remember, Square-Enix said that Ashe and Vaan do not fall in love with each other, but with other characters, and somebody said that

• SPOILERS* Ashe falls in love with Balthier *SPOILERS*.

What a bizarre rumor. I played through the game when it came out (I speak Japanese) and it'm most assuredly not true. I think what Square-Enix meant was that romance isn't a part of the plot, but the characters are involved in romantic relationships that began *prior* to the start of the game- all of which are detailed in the instruction manual (Vaan-Panelo, Balthier-Fran, Ashe-that prince guy). Not a spoiler, but the box explicitly states that romance is not a part of the game (FF10's box listed that it was, as part of the "parental advisory" sticker).--220.29.92.4 11:25, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Why do we still know so little?

Why do we know so little? The game came out two days ago at the time of this printing. Surely someone must've got their hands on it. Plus, this information is mostly for the Japanese version of the game, not most other versions. 68.112.246.238 00:55, 4 November 2006 (UTC)Fishdert

Vaan Ratsbane?

Who seriously thinks his last name is Ratsbane? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.164.73.66 (talk • contribs) .

i believe they say so in the game... -Xornok 21:16, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

It's a play on the fact that he kills rats in the sewer, not his true last name. Rat's bane. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.164.73.66 (talk • contribs) .

Do you have a source for that? Axem Titanium 00:08, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

No, it just seems obvious. If only I had turned on the subtitles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.164.73.66 (talk • contribs)

I don't believe it's Ratsbane. at the point of the scene in the japanese version, old dalan called him ガキ (boy). Perhaps anyone saw the credits? Please provide official source and not just in-game reference that come up once. 私はBluerfnです 17:16, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

There's no reason to need to provide a source for it being his last name. The fact that he is called "Vaan Ratsbane" in the game suggests that "Ratsbane" is his last name. Conversely, there's nothing to suggest that it isn't his last name. The Splendiferous Gegiford 19:32, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

i admit defeat, there's no shame in admitting defeat, but until another time! 私はBluerfnです 19:44, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Are you saying that you'll bring this up again later? Also, being called "boy" hardly counts as an argument... Anyway, it doesn't really matter at this point. Axem Titanium 22:19, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

If you have the subtitles on, I believe it says "rat's bane," rather than "Ratsbane." In case you don't know what bane means, it means doom, so that would make perfect sense.--Sephiroth2.0 14:14, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

It would make more sense for it to be rat's bane. However, I've been playing the game with subtitles on and it's distinctively "Ratsbane." Apologies to all of those who, like me, find that to be an in-joke and not an actual last name. --WW79 14:37, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

I just did the same. It is ironic, though. I'm guessing they intended that.--Sephiroth2.0 14:59, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm actually starting to think it isn't his last name, now. In the official strategy guide they spell out the full names of all the supporting characters (Vayne Carudas Solidor, Cidolfus Demen Bunansa, etc) but Reks is left with no last name. The Splendiferous Gegiford 18:03, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

That is official enough proof for me: no mention of the last name ratsbane in the official guide. See, the FFXII Ultimania also doesn't mention the name ratsbane as reks nor vaan's last name, but it spelled out vossler york azelas and rasler heios nabradia in full romaji and katakana. 私はBluerfnです 18:26, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Wait, what do their names have to do with Vaan's? Axem Titanium 20:36, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Heh, i'm mentioning their names as written in the ultimania to say that the Ultimania lists out full names, and Vaan is just written Vaan （ヴァン）in the Characters section, no ratsbane (レツベイン がない). ratsbane is a word after all, going by the lines of the great translator Smith, i'd say it's some medieval-old english word. 私はBluerfnです 21:37, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Spoiler Marks

You guys need to add Spoiler marks before the character section because after reading that, I felt as if some of the plot has been ruined for me like the Balthier being Cid's son part. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.61.57.127 (talk • contribs)

Well, then maybe you shouldn't be reading this page, considering Wikipedia HAS SPOILERS. lol, pwned. Axem Titanium 22:19, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia wouldn't make spoiler warnings if they felt that same stubborn way you do, so someone should put some up. Chocobo Knight 19:28, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Mist

Could the Mist possibly be a reference to FFIX? Considering early in the game, it is revealed to have adverse effects on monsters (Thextera, for example), similarly to the mist in Final Fantasy IX. 171.66.188.90 15:32, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

The article already states that "In a nod to FFIX, Mist..."--WW79 16:18, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

FFXII =/= FFT =/=FFTA?

I bring this up because they keep referring to Ivalice as a world in XII as opposed to a country in FFT and a city in FFTA (which becomes a country later on).

My point is, unless there's any proof that XII is meant to be in the same timeline as FFT, don't jump to conclusions in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.224.94.234 (talk • contribs)

It's not like those terms are mutually exclusive. And who's "they"? Anyway, developers have repeatedly stated that they take place in the same world and trying to get any further than that would simply be a question of semantics. Axem Titanium 22:58, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

By "they" I really meant to refer to the unseen narrator. Apologies.

you see, there are three continents in Ivalice - Ordalia, Kerwon and Valendia. There are references to a Galtean federation, which had since split into Dalmasca, Nabradia, Archadia and Rozarria. So what is Ivalice? I rather think Ivalice is a world. In fact, the developers never mentioned FFXII to be happening before or after FFT, it's just a different Ivalice in a different era. 私はBluerfnです 22:11, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

In addition, the intro to FFXII states the following: "A warrior takes sword in hand, Clasping a gem to his heart. Engraving vanishing memories into the sword, He places finely honed skills into the stone. Spoken from the sword, handed down from the stone... Now the story can be told... That is the story of a world called Ivalice." I think it's clear that Ivalice is in the fact the name of the world in ADDITION to it being the name of a region/country. Oh, and FFTA was a dream-world. Noah 14:49, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Hmmm... It's been a while so I don't exactly remember if FFT referred Ivalice as a world. In-game however, the characters talk about Ivalice as a nation (with "provinces" such as Lesalia, Limberry, etc.). It's hard to tell since the designers didn't have FFXII in mind when making FFT. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.108.25.62 (talk) 10:23, 25 December 2006 (UTC).

Ivalice is a world, and the kingdom of Ivalice is a kingdom, it's as simple at that. Kariteh 20:11, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

FFXII takes place BEFORE FFT, not after

the reference used to state that FFXII takes place after FFT is mistaken. FFXII is modeled after the roman empire while FFT is modeled in the middle ages, and follows a similar placement in time. In Final Fantasy Tactics, there are points that heavily imply the timeline of FFXII existed prior to the game. Agrias Oaks is quoted saying that " I hear a 'lost civilization' is hidden under Goug.... When St. Ajora was alive, airships were in the sky, and human robots in town. But time passed, technology was lost, and no one knows if it ever really existed." I believe Alexander O. Smith translated part of it as "when airships plied the sky" in the english FFXII trailer. There are also floating lost continents in FFT, which are part of the map in FFXII.

Original research, go get Square Enix to make an official statement about it before we can report it here. As of now, our references says after and that is how it will stay until reliably proven otherwise. Axem Titanium 04:14, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

I don't believe the reference can be trusted. While the source is from an interview with the development team, where's the transcript of the interview? What I know is the developers intended FFXII to be in a different time period. i believe they meant for it to be long BEFORE final fantasy tactics. there is another proof in Final Fantasy Tactics, you can find it in the Ivalice article: Sweegy Woods is a location where now extinct Moogles have once lived here. I don't think extinct Moogles can just pop out back alive. 私はBluerfnです 18:55, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

The gamespot article statement that says FF12 takes place after FFT is the authors opinion, nowhere does the article cite a specific person who said that. The statement by the editor should have no bearing on this topic. Noah 06:41, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Does anyone have the FFXII Ultimania? That's sure to give a definitive answer. Axem Titanium 20:36, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

The Ultimania does mention the Kiltea religion founded approximately 2000 years before the main story (704 old valendian?) and the galtea federation's history, but no mention of FFT. 私はBluerfnです 21:46, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

I fully agree w/ the first statement. FFT does mention the "Airship Graveyard" from the world of Ivalice. It makes logical sense that the technology was "lost" prior to FFT. However, to avoid the before/after issue (which has NOT been confirmed either way), I have edited the text instead to include a direct quote from a FF12 developer. See the cite for more information. Thanks. Noah 06:39, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Er, Noah, there were two sources of confirmation you removed. One was a gamespot interview with the developers, where it was said XII is in Tactics future (though I could understand it being questioned, lacking as it is in a transcript). The second source is taken directly from the game and confirms the timeline, as it describes St. Ajora as having been born over two millenia before XII, where he was born only 1200 years before Tactics. If one accepts that T and XII are set in the same world (which the developers have confirmed, and that you, too, seem to be happy with) then the timeline falls into place with that Bestiary entry. As such, I'm going to revert that to the sourced information- change it back only if you have a truly compelling reason, please? --80.235.138.11 09:34, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

No, that was the opinion of the Gamespot editor. It was not a direct quote. Can you show me a direct quote? If so I will let you edit it. Noah 02:42, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

I honestly don't understand your position on this, Noah. You seem to accept that FFT takes place in the same world as XII. In which case, I would again direct you to that third source, which describes an historical event shared by the two games. Logically, given that both games give a date for the historical event in relation to their 'present', it should stand as evidence to their positions in the timeline? You surely can't accept that T and XII share the same world and yet challenge their relative positions when the timeline can be concluded from in game sources. The gamespot article gives no direct quote, for sure, but it does summarise information gathered from an interview; information that, while contestable, is supported by ingame evidence. --80.235.138.11 12:51, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

And if that was the case Anon, then how do you explain the other consistancy issues? I.E. in FFXII, the entry talks about the Light of Kilita religion, while the St. Ajora in FFT was part of the Fara Church. FFT talks about the Graveyard of Airships, and about Airship technology long lost. In those missing years, did Ivalice suddenly reinvent that technology? You talk about the 12 centuries prior vs. the 20 centuries mentioned in FFXII -- you must have forgot that FFT takes place another 400 years AFTER the end of the story line (when Olan completes his work, the Durai Writings). So if that's the case, and the two St. Ajora's ARE in fact the same, that leaves only 400 years between FFT and FFXII, which does not make sense being as there is little or no mention of FFT in FFXII, while FFT has numerous references to FFXII. The more logical choice would be that FFXII took place many, many centuries before FFT, and the "Ajora Glabados" in FFT was simply named after the famous St. Ajora of centuries past. Noah 07:44, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Anon, I'd just like to point out Wikipedia's policy on original research. Specifically, that it is not allowed in any form. That basically means that you can't do your own research about something and then add it as fact to a Wikipedia article. In order to include it, it must be already published by a secondary source that could conceivably be checked by other editors for correctness. In this case, it would be a reputable website or a book (like the Ultimania). Axem Titanium 20:33, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you Axem. And with that being said, since the Devs have not specifically stated one way or another whether FFXII takes place before or after FFT, then the page should reflect just that, and not someones opinion. Thanks for the discussion. Oh, and PS. Since the official FFXII website states that Ivalice is in fact the "world", I will be changing that back as well. Noah 07:17, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

The bestiary page doesn't actually name Ajora's religion. It just goes on to say he broke away from the Kiltia church and founded a religion based around Faram as the one true god. Also, there are eight hundred years between the games. The story is told four hundred years after the fact, but that doesn't change that it happened 1200 years after Ajora's death. 800 years is plenty of time to reinvent technology (particularly since they have magic on their side). And, y'know, author's intent: you think it more likely they put Ajora in XII to suggest there were two of them? Okay...whatever. And again with the world thing, despite the game saying the opposite. The Ivalice bestiary entry begins "A region...". I don't understand how the Ajora thing is original research, since it's right there in the game. So it would only be allowed in the article if XII said "Final Fantasy Tactics happened over eight hundred years ago", in those exact words? I might as well argue that Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic takes place after the movies, since no one in Kotor says "By the way, that Galactic Empire we say this game is set before is the one from the movies". But if it's that big a deal that we need an EXACT QUOTE, then whatever. Let's argue whether the Occuria were responsible for Ashe seeing Rasler's ghost, next, since it's only ever strongly implied. --80.235.138.11 11:07, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

By the way, if my motivation in this is in question, I'm simply trying to provide some more info. The timeline has been debated like you wouldn't believe, so I guessed evidence from the game might help settle it. But okay, I'll do it elsewhere, since Wikipedia apparently only takes developer quotes...? *shrug* --80.235.138.11 11:17, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Anon, take care. Noah 22:03, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Phobos Leaf

What I got is a Phobos Glaze, not a Phobos Leaf. But please do correct me if a Phobos Leaf actually exists as a reward in another Mark Hunt. I know that in the Japanese edition, it is indeed translated as Phobos Leaf. Please clarify.

Kupo-po! I don't think you should discuss gaming stuff here, much less about a specific item. I suggest you find a legit gaming forum that discusses these matters and whatnot. 私はBluerfnです 19:03, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

I think he's talking about the supposed reference to the Phobos Leaf mentioned in the article. Axem Titanium 20:36, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Adding a website

Is it possible to add the website: Final Fantasy XII Europe http://www.ff12-europe.com

It provides good information for the release of the game in the UK. Even though most would consider this a fansite, it's updated often.

Regards, Sophie

It is indeed a fansite and WP:EL says that only one fansite is permitted per article, that spot being held by some other site I don't really care about. Axem Titanium 20:36, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

I suggest adding the external link: http://www.thesimexchange.com/stock.php?id=4 This link is helpful becomes it contains the game's stock quote that forecasts the lifetime worldwide sales and public buzz for Final Fantasy XII. This method of wisdom of crowds applied to video games seems to fit Wikipedia's goals. The page also features aggregated user submitted news, images, videos, and discussion on Final Fantasy XII. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 130.13.146.201 (talk • contribs) .

That site would be good as a source, but not as an external link. I've added it to the to-do box. Axem Titanium 18:02, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Who messed with this page?

The page looks like it was totally demonlished, and I'd like to know how I can fix it or how I can contact someone who can fix it. I love this game and I would hate to see its page vandalized like it presently is

65.9.212.241 22:07, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

It was vandalized by 63.193.91.60 (more than once). AntiVandalBot caught it the first time but missed it the second time. --Robomojo 22:23, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Comparisons to other FF games

The references section could probably be beefed up or moved into a separate article. I've been playing since FF1 and this game has a lot taken from prior stuff. Granted, some things like moogles, certain weapons/armors, etc. you expect to see in most FF games, but there are some others that you don't expect. Like in FF1 you have the floater stone which lets the airship fly, and in FF12 there's a stone that lets you fly over the Jagd (which really is the first time you get the airship anyway). FF6 and FF12 both feature as characters: a thief (Locke/Vaan), a former soldier now an enemy of those they served (Celes/Basch), an overly confident airship owner (Setzer/Balthier), a pariah that goes berserk in the presence of strong magic (Terra/Fran), a royal next in line to the throne thought to be dead (Edgar/Ashe). You can also make comparisons between General Leo and Larsa, Gestahl and the Emperor, Kefka and Vayne. And in both games Cid is a researcher studying magic rocks to help the empire. Also take a look at FF4 which has an evil wall that will crush you if you don't kill it fast enough, a fight against an antlion in a mine, and a battle where metallic items are weighed down ... all of which are in FF 12 as well. 74.138.214.16 22:50, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Actually, I'm not even sure that section should be there. The list of references is potentially endless and also constitutes original research. Also, none of the other Final Fantasy featured articles have such lists so there is no precedent for having them. Axem Titanium 22:59, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

You can make comparsions all you want, but that doesn't mean they'll be logical. I don't see the Locke/Vaan connection, Vaan wasn't a former soldier. He would be what, 15 or so during the war. You might get the impression Vaan is a thief like Locke or "Treasure Hunter" if you will, but he doesn't make his living by stealing. Basch isn't like Celes, it isn't fighting Ashe, or any Dalmascan for that matter (spoiler)except Vossler(/spoiler) and he certainly can't sing like Celes! Setzer and Balthier, not really in that they are over confident but that they are both gentlemen in the truest sense. Kefka and Vayne? Vayne doesn't the 16bit laugh of doom. The Demon Wall isn't exclusive to just IV and XII, the connections seem pretty shallow. Now XII and Tactics connect rather nicely, for a series of games known for having no connection to each other directly. All the Lucvai (Zodiac Braves) are espers in XII, you can see part of the Ordallia continent on both world maps (Tactics you see the eastern half, 12 you see the west) some of the music in XII comes from Tactics as well. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.56.26.190 (talk • contribs) .

Vandalism

I noticed the page had been recently vandalized, can we mark the page to be uneditable by non-registered users temporarily?

ShinraShinra 07:33, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

You may request for protection here, if you wish, though I'm not sure it's necessary at this point. Axem Titanium 22:15, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Fan Links

mukou 13:49, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Should fan links not be allowed at all, due to the recent conflict? All content on fan-sites are the same as Wikipedia anyway, and that is what official links are for. Just my opinion.

REPLY POSTED by Aaron: I just dont see why you dont have a fan site and official site links... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.69.17.9 (talk • contribs) .

Both official and fan links are present. It's just that there's always some moron bitching about how his site is better and "deserves" to be on the Wikipedia article. Axem Titanium 14:33, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

< mukou 15:40, 20 November 2006 (UTC) >

Which is why I am proposing official sources only. Or if not official, a 'major' site (Gamespot for example). This is just my opinion, of course.

There are official sites already... Axem Titanium 02:44, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

What I think he means is get rid of the fansites, and just have official or major sites. Chocobo Knight 18:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

< mukou 12:08, 26 November 2006 (UTC) >

Indeed, that is what I mean. Thus ending the conflict between fan-sites. After all, Official Sites (which contain official sources) are not only more reliable, but in truth, all that is really needed other than the Wiki page itself. Of course, this is just my opinion.

Fran's colouring/features

Fran is the only non-Hume (human) character in the main cast, but on a human standard would be considered an "African-American" by skin color and features.

This would be OR unless you could find a source that explicitly says this (like the modelling of Ashe based on French features, which was based off an interview) I'm striking it out. ColourBurst 18:56, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

'...but on a human standard would be considered an "African-American" by skin color and features.'

Talk about PC dribble! I suppose I'm just beating a dead horse but this has to rank up there with the top three most ridiculous things ever written on Wikipedia. Why 'African-American'? Why not African? Or subcontinental Indian? Or aboriginal? And what 'features' is this person referring to? Fran's rabbit ears? Her rabbit nose? What about her European dialect? This is like arguing that a hippopotamus is 'an African-American on a human standard' because of the color of its hide. Honestly, whoever wrote that really should feel ashamed of his/herself. o.0 --Grimgerde 02:41, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Hey, what about the moogles? They have clearely been a non-hume bunch interacting with the series for years, but would from a human point of view be considered norwegians by the lenght of their thumbs and their sometimes red balls hanging out of their foreheads. I know this. Please think about it in your future meetings with moogles.62.92.35.24 19:39, 29 January 2007 (UTC)pleaseremoveme

XII is NOT the first Final Fantasy to receive 5/5 on X-Play

Unless spin-offs don't count. Final Fantasy Tactics Advance got a 5/5 from X-Play as well. Just needed to point that out.

spinoffs dont count... -Xornok 23:35, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Editing of Characters

I just did a very thorough editing of the characters section on the main page. :)

However, since I replaced a lot of the text with copying and pasting from an edited version, I think all of the character links (to individual profiles) in the descriptions were deleted.

Just wanted to point that out, in case someone noticed and wondered how it came about. I'm not very good at fixing things and I don't have any more time as of now, so I'll leave it be. Though of course, many thanks would go to whoever would add them for me. It's just adding some double brackets, right?

Xaari 22:16, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Trivia

I was looking over my game the other day, and noticed that the title you get for defeating the Marlboro Carrot is Freshmaker. Since a marlboros signature attack is Bad Breath, I was wondering if this could be counted as a reference to Mentos (The Freshmaker) Crisco 1492 01:43, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

That seems trivial almost to a fault and entirely not notable for inclusion. It is interesting, however, and you might be able to put together a list of trivia about FFXII somewhere other than Wikipedia. Axem Titanium 02:04, 28 November 2006 (UTC)