Talk:Filmfare Award for Best Film

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Filmfare Award for Best Film article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

Film: Awards / Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Film awards task force.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

Accuracy

I noticed that 1973 was missing so I went to the official site and saw that it was anurag... but that is listed as 1974 for us. Some things are wrong and we need to check this whole list. gren グレン 20:09, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't sure if that site was necessarily always right? If it is the official site (like our filmfare awards article says) then why is it to out of date, only having until the 2004 awards. http://www.imdb.com/Sections/Awards/Filmfare_Awards/ IMDb has a list that puts anurag in 1974 but it puts Be-Imaan in the 1973 awards... basically it says that everything we have is one year off. I suppose our best bet is the filmfare site... but, I'm not sure. gren グレン 20:17, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I propose that Filmfare Best Film of 50 Years be merged into Filmfare Awards. As the name suggests, the Filmfare Best film of 50 years will not be given for 42 more years. There exists no other extra material in the article, and this award can be prominently mentioned in either Filmfare Awards or Filmfare Award for Best Film. I don't think there is anything more to say about the Best film of 50 years award itself, so I think its better merged. Lynch 7 14:39, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be better in Filmfare Awards#History, but the source needs to be carried over. BollyJeff || talk 14:52, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Proposal edited. Lynch 7 15:18, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Filmfare Awards#History. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 15:38, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Years don't match

The Filmfare awards are awarded for films released in the previous year. For example the ceremony held this year, on Jan 15, 2016 was the 61st Filmfare Awards 2015, and not Filmfare Awards 2016 as mentioned in the article.Smi.hegde (talk) 08:34, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Filmfare Award for Best Film. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131111194746/http://recipeguide.indiatimes.com/awards2001/ex_film.html to http://recipeguide.indiatimes.com/awards2001/ex_film.html
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://filmfareawards.indiatimes.com/
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://filmfareawards.indiatimes.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:57, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]