Talk:Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Retrolord (talk · contribs) 19:47, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to review this! ★★Retro Lord ★★ 19:47, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking it on; I'll look forward to your thoughts. Cheers, -- Khazar2 (talk) 19:59, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I've gone through the article and can't find anything to pull you up on. I've checked all the images and they are all fine too. I will pass this tommorow provided nothing jumps out at me. Great article Khazar, thanks ★★Retro Lord ★★ 20:02, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! -- Khazar2 (talk) 20:09, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Passed! ★★Retro Lord ★★ 08:20, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Terrific, thanks again. -- Khazar2 (talk) 15:55, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! Great work. –Prototime (talk · contribs) 00:07, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.