Talk:Fieldfare/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: PumpkinSky (talk · contribs) 01:45, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is clear and concise, without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   "Unusually for a thrush," sounds odd to me. PumpkinSky talk 02:00, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   Ref 10 needs a publisher parameter. PumpkinSky talk 01:48, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

   "lores" needs linked to Lore (anatomy).

   "There is a faint pale streak above the eye and the lores and under-eye" the two and's and two the's sounds awkward PumpkinSky talk 02:04, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

   Ref 2 is a dead link. Is about.com a reliable source? Refs 3 and 5 need page numbers.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   Good quality and all free. PumpkinSky talk 01:57, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

   English translation of Norwegian on commons would be nice. PumpkinSky talk 01:57, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

• Thank you for taking on this review. I have dealt with the points you raise above and also polished up the lead section a bit. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:46, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

I have removed/amended the references you mention above with the exception of the "Dictionary of Scientific Bird Names". I don't have a copy so do not have a page number. Now added, as Jimfbleak has kindly supplied page numbers. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:34, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the review. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:14, 13 September 2013 (UTC)