Talk:Field, British Columbia

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

Canada: British Columbia / Geography / Communities Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian communities.

Residency restrictions?

Does Field have the same residency restrictions as Banff? If so, this should be noted. 23skidoo 04:46, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's in a national park, so you can't just go build a house anywhere; but between it being in a different national park and a different province, I doubt it, other than only so much accommodation is available. What are Banff's residency restrictions?Skookum1 04:49, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You basically can't live there unless you work in the park and/or in Banff itself, although I believe there is a grandfather clause (pardon the pun) that allows some seniors to live there full-time as I believe they have a seniors residence building. Many people who work in Banff actually live in Canmore, located outside the park about 15 minutes up the highway. I believe Jasper has similar rules. So while I would expect Field to have restrictions on development, what I'm wondering is whether it too restricts who can actually live there. It would be a federal government decision, not a provincial one, however. 23skidoo 13:54, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a link to the field community plan which should outline residency restrictions: [1] Mtobey 18:41, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Stephen House

This venerable old hotel, long vanished, could use its own article at some point so it can in teh "Grand Railway Hotels" category....Skookum1 (talk) 23:04, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On further thought it can just be a section here...I'd add it already, as there's some public domain pics in BC Archives and elsewhere, but I'm not sure if the dates of its building and what happened to it - was it destroyed by fire? Or just decommissioned and torn down?Skookum1 (talk) 17:23, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There are only three online photos at BC Archives there may be more in the National Archives of Canada or Vancouver Public Library archives, also in any CPR history archives that may exist . The BC Arch pohtos are old enough that {{Canada50}} can be used (i.e. for versions trimmed of the BCArch logo/whitespace.....Skookum1 (talk) 17:35, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hm that's not the right name for the license template; I'll be back when I find out what it is...it's something like that....Skookum1 (talk) 20:06, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This Flickr file is a William Notman photo from the McCord Museum in Montreal; it's probably PD I'm not sure what the status of Flickr images are.Skookum1 (talk) 20:07, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://fieldbc.ca/history/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. John of Reading (talk) 07:36, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]