Talk:Theological notes

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Theological notes article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Christianity: Catholicism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Catholic Church portal This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Mid-importance).

Philosophy: Epistemology Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Epistemology

Religion Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Other talk page banners

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fides ecclesiastica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110810175256/http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/audiences/alpha/data/aud19930324en.html to http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/audiences/alpha/data/aud19930324en.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:12, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Completed the merger

I saw there were some still-pending merger proposals, so I moved them here. I'm new to the merger process, so I hope I did it correctly. LimonesMI (talk) 22:13, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As a result of the merger, perhaps this article should be renamed Theological grades of certainty or something similar.

I see that Category:Theological grades of certainty exists and is likely redundant as a result of these mergers. LimonesMI (talk) 22:16, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@LimonesMI: all your edit summaries contain something along the line of See Talk:merger discussion section. However, the link leads to nowhere. Could you provide a link to the merger discussions for what you have merged into this article? Veverve (talk) 07:32, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed my past edit summaries, and I'm not sure what my intention was in creating those links to a (nonexistent) merger discussion section. Given those edits were a few months ago, my memory of it is a bit fuzzy. LimonesMI (talk) 16:56, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

@Manannan67: you merged some of the four articles to this one without explaining why.

It seems like it was a bad idea, since all the articles you have merged into this one are distinct concepts and not variations of fides ecclesiastica beliefs but respective levels of belief.

See for example [1]:

they are to be believed with divine faith (fides divina) and if they are also defined by the Church, then with defined divine faith (fides divina definita). If the Church defines a doctrine that is not immediately revealed, it is to be believed with ecclesiastical faith (fides ecclesiastica). A doctrine that theologians generally regard as a truth of revelation, but that has not been finally promulgated by the Church, is said to be proximate to faith (proxima fidei), and if such a truth is guaranteed as the logical conclusion from a revealed doctrine, it is called theologically certain (theologice certa). Below this level are many graces of certainty, ranging from common teaching (sententia communis), when Catholic theologians responsive to the Church's authority agree on some historical event as having occurred through the miraculous intervention of God.

I will now fix this by moving the article as suggested above. Veverve (talk) 03:13, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I merged TWO articles, both stubs tagged for notability. These are all gradations of the same concept, and while you may think it "a bad idea", apparently User:LimonesMI did not as he/she merged the rest. Please stop trying to fix things that aren't broke. Manannan67 (talk) 03:31, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These are all gradations of the same concept: yes, gradations of theological certainty; not gradations of the fides ecclesiastica level of certainty. It is LimonesMI who suggested the article be renamed on this talk page, as I said.

Now, everything is fixed. Veverve (talk) 04:42, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Doctrinal Commentary on the Concluding Formula of the Professio fidei

The Doctrinal Commentary on the Concluding Formula of the Professio fidei from points 5. to 11. (included) mentions some theological notes. Veverve (talk) 23:09, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]