Talk:Fibrothorax/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Originalmess (talk · contribs) 02:25, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- The lead should be expanded - this is an article of decent length; see Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia for another GA disease. The Level 3 headings under Mechanism and Signs and symptoms can be removed, while the ones under Causes are confusing. Might need an explanation of what iatrogenic means or at least link to Iatrogenesis.
A lot of the in-line citations are either inside punctuation (should be outside) or have spaces before them (no space necessary). Several of the refs are repeats of each other (I might just go and fix that).(I fixed these issues.) For any citation/grammar errors or prose, I would submit this to WP:GOCE for a review no matter what. They're great!
- The lead should be expanded - this is an article of decent length; see Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia for another GA disease. The Level 3 headings under Mechanism and Signs and symptoms can be removed, while the ones under Causes are confusing. Might need an explanation of what iatrogenic means or at least link to Iatrogenesis.
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- Checked with earwig, no copyvio. Aside from the MOS stuff under 1, refs look good. However, not sure if Evidence Reviewed or The Mesothelioma Center are the best sources. They're not in Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard but asking them might be worthwhile.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- [1] I think adding content from this source that's already used would improve/expand the mechanism section quite a bit! Few useful things outside of this source came up for a brief search on the history of fibrothorax discovery/treatment, but there's content that might be worth adding.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- notifying nominator
- Pass/Fail:
Starting a GA review of Fibrothorax. originalmesshow u doin that busta rhyme? 02:25, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
- To the nominator - unfortunately, you're inactive and the article can't pass yet! Please feel free to improve and re-nominate the article if you ever come back. Thanks! originalmesshow u doin that busta rhyme? 04:57, 18 November 2018 (UTC)