Talk:Fiberfab Avenger GT

Disagree with merge with Fiberfab

I don't think that it makes sense to merge Fiberfab with Fiberfab Avenger GT This would be like merging Chevrolet with Chevrolet Camaro or Audi with Audi TT. The main article is about the company, while the second article should be about the model. I would not like to see this happen.
Tommycw1 12:11, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think Tommycw1's comment makes sense. The article is and should remain about the model. However, I remember this article used to contain much more information, and it was good information. The article does maintain the company name, and a link to external information which does put all of the information in one place. I think keeping the model information separate, helps avoid confusion between model which are similar, but distinctly different.Lance cory (talk) 19:21, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with merge Fiberfab and Avenger.

 Large manufacturers may produce hundreds of distinct models over the 
years.  As a kit manufacturer Fiberfab produced other shells,(and I feel
 they should be included as well), but nearly all the bodies produced
 were variations of the Avenger/Valkyrie body molds. 
 They should all fit conviently in one entry.
66.69.126.211 19:08, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]