Talk:Ferrymead Bays

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Football

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Ferrymead Bays be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Point of view

Wikipedia articles must be written from a neutral point of view. While I have no reason to dispute the factual accuracy of this article, use of words like we or pleased imply a personal point of view that also implies original research. I am not saying this article is original research, rather it just reads like it might be. This is a matter of style rather than substance and changing a few words to the third person would be enough to correct the defect that has existed since the history section was added in 2011. Removing the banner would then be justified if these changes were made. Rather than make these changes immediately, I am explaining myself here in case anybody is concerned about changes being made to this article, which has not been edited for some time. Of course I am assuming that everything that is said in this article can be verified by visiting the club website. However, having some inline citations from independent sources would also reassure readers of the veracity of this article and assist them in quickly locating the sources of the facts stated and verifying the accuracy of any statements made. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 03:00, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]