Jump to content

Talk:Fern/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2

As of now, this article remains muddled, as per several threads above:

  • Classification and the terminology used in describing it varies between the traditional system and the more modern clade-based approach, and doesn't accurately reflect the range of alternatives found in current texts.
  • Much of the detail is actually only about leptosporangiate ferns; it's telling that as of now there's not a single image of a horsetail.

I don't believe that as it stands this is a B class article and I'm going to downgrade it to C, pending some more work on it. Peter coxhead (talk) 07:08, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Can someone with botany and image editing experience

Frond morphology in Dryopteris dilatata, labeled in French.

…download this image, and based on a solid, graduate or advanced undergraduate botanical texts, add English labels to this image of a fern frond—citing the original image source, and indicating the texts used for the English labeling in the description—and then reupload it, so that we can place into this article, in the anatomical section?

Please. So the article is of much greater use in linking, and for student reading. Le Prof. 71.239.87.100 (talk) 20:46, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Christenhusz & Chase article

A recent edit, which I've undone, used this source:
Christenhusz, M.J.M.; Chase, M.W. (2014). "Trends and concepts of fern classification". Annals of Botany. 113 (4): 571–594. doi:10.1093/aob/mct299.
to say that the term "monilophyte" was "better avoided" and "[b]est to stick with the term 'fern' for this lineage." The article certainly needs to be taken into account, but Wikipedia doesn't dictate what is correct, only reports what others say and do. All three terms (pteridophytes, monilophytes and just ferns) can be found in reliable sources referring to the taxon that is the subject of the article. Some more work needs to be done to incorporate Christenhusz & Chase correctly. Peter coxhead (talk) 17:22, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

You are correct. Paper should be presented (summarized, based on its abstract), but not promoted, because, while being a review article, it is presenting a classification paradigm that it presents as "new". It has to be left to other secondary sources, post-2014, to make clear that this has become the prevailing paradigm. Le Prof 71.239.87.100 (talk) 20:48, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Fern. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:20, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Fern. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:33, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fern. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:54, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fern. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:01, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fern/Archive_2&oldid=1077069564"