Talk:Fermium/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:26, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I'll make some straightforward copyedits as I go - please revert any changes I inadvertently make. I'll jot notes below. Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:26, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

...with A = 242–260. - I'd write this out as prose, hence "with atomic weights of 242 to 260"

ditto 'h' to hours (you have 'days' already just before)

link nuclide

you've used both actinide and actinoid in the same article. Any reason or can they be streamlined?

any potential uses of it?

I'd mention in the lead that it can only be produced in minute quantities.

I went ahead of the nominator and fixed those issues. In one place, there is a long line of "h" values, which I hesitate changing to hours, for brevity reasons. No uses because of enormous price and scarcity. Materialscientist (talk) 04:30, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:

Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:

Citations to reliable sources, where required:

No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:

Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:

Pass or Fail: