Talk:Fergalicious

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Hip hop Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

R&B and Soul Music Mid‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in hip hop music Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in hip hop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in hip hop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in hip hop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in hip hop musicTemplate:WikiProject Women in hip hop musicWomen in hip hop music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Info Box

At the bottom, if you look at the box, it says "Fergie featuring "Will.I.Am singles chronology", but he wasn't in "London Bridge", nor "Glamorous". This needs to be changed. DJ Biloedau 12:37 PM, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Samples

Are they? KriZe 22:21, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Error

I changed an error in a link to the music video, because when clicked, youtube gave the error "malformed video id". after further inspection of the link, i saw that there was a "|" in there. its all fixed now, though. 24.159.237.75 06:18, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reporting this. The URL actually shouldn't be there at all since it is a potential copyright violation. I've removed it. -SpuriousQ ([[User talk:them per WP:CHARTS guidelines? For example, there seem to be a lot of Dutch charts

Fair use rationale for Image:Fergie single fergalicious.jpg

Image:Fergie single fergalicious.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:30, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nelly Furtado

...talked about this song in an interview when she was asked who her verse in "Give it To Me" was about. She said it was started because of some lyrics in the song: ..."but I'm not promiscuous,but if..." Should we add this to the song? Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67t6-lpZds0 and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Give_It_to_Me $ą|εɱ 08:09, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We need to remove the quote or add a new source, because that one has been deleted on YouTube. 72.240.163.23 00:08, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info, new video added!!!$ą|εɱ ^chat 04:40, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the UK

I thought I'd mention, lately on the music channel The Vault (in the UK) this song has been on a couple of times. I thought it was never released here? Are music channels allowed to show it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.241.154.210 (talk) 18:27, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plot

I am assuming good faith but I do not think I have ever seen a plot summary for a song before. I think it should at least be rewritten and shortened so it is not just an expanded version of the lyrics. --Ubardak (talk) 07:11, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Ubardak. You may want to look a little bit more, lol. Several songs have plot summaries. See Baby Boy (song), Gimme the Light.--Listen to your Princess, dear Wikipedians. (talk) 20:00, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Intro

The opening words are an homage to 2 Live Crew's "Throw The D." Not sure where or if to put this in the art. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.168.125.31 (talk) 08:57, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Fergalicious. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:45, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Fergalicious. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:31, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]