Jump to content

Talk:Ferdinando Gorges

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 06:54, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New World Presence

[edit]

The page on the Plymouth Colony claims that Squanto returned from Europe in 1619 as a "guide" to Gorges. That implies that Gorges himself made an expedition. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.239.136.30 (talk) 03:28, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dukes County claim

[edit]

The article Thomas Mayhew says that Gorges had to be paid off for a competing claim on at least part of what is now Dukes County, Massachusetts. What was the nature of that claim? -- Beland (talk) 22:10, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sir Ferdinando Gorges, as principal proprietor and president of the Council for New England, controlled much of New England, outside jurisdiction of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. He was also proprietor of (what later became) the state of Maine. In the area of Massachusetts, though, Gorges's claims overlapped with those of William Alexander, Earl of Sterling, due to the hazy nature of the knowledge of the coastline's geography. In 1641 an agent for Stirling, apparently unbeknownst to Gorges, sold both Nantucket and Martha's Vineyard to Thomas Mayhew of Watertown. In that same year, according to a later letter from Mayhew to Governor Andros of Massachusetts, Mayhew claimed that Richard Vines, an agent for Gorges, conveyed the Island to him. Jurisdiction over Martha's Vineyard was problematic during the next several decades, bouncing between the Bay Colony and an independent entity and then New York. In 1671 the governor of New York appointed Thomas Mayhew governor for life of Martha's Vineyard, and in 1683 Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket and several smaller islands were incorporated as Duke's County. Finally, in 1691, Martha's Vineyard became a part of Massachusetts Bay Colony under its new charter (and after negotiations between Massachusetts and New York). As you can see, it's a tangled question, but Gorges's last contact with the island was, I believe, in 1641 when his agent signed over Martha's Vineyard to Mayhew. As proprietor of Maine, Gorges made no later claims on the island, as far as I know. (Gorges himself was dead by 1647.)[1] I provide a link here to the Encyclopedia Britannica, and here is a link to part of what the well-known historian Charles Banks wrote about Mayhew's claim.[2] Mayhew is still regarded as the authority, and I'll poke around a bit and see if I can come up with more of his text. I don't have his three-volume history to hand, but a friend does and I may have him look it up if I can't find it online. MarmadukePercy (talk) 23:41, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Ferdinando Gorges/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

in "mourt's relation" vol 1,there is mentioned that gorges had a run in with indians ,just escapeing with his life in the north east america. 71.118.37.38 17:44, 21 March 2007 (UTC) george[reply]

Last edited at 17:44, 21 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 15:04, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

This is a misreading of Mourt's Relation. On page 86 of the 1865 edition (which you can read at Hathitrust) and page 185 of the 1841 edition (which you can read at the Internet Archive]) you can see that the reference is to "Sir Ferdinando Gorges's men" who had an encounter with the Nausites (resulting in the deaths of 3 and the escape of 2) eight months before the Mayflower settlers met Samoset in March 1621. Georges was never in North America. AnthroMimus (talk) 02:26, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Incidentally, much misinformation and considerable unnecessary dispute could be avoided if contributors used page citations rather than vague references to inadequately described volumes. (There is only one volume, although several editions, of Mourt's Relation, for example.) A large number of these old sources can be found on the internet. Being transparent not only establishes one's good faith, it also prevents other people from wasting their time. AnthroMimus (talk) 02:41, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ferdinando Gorges. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:12, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ferdinando Gorges. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:53, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ferdinando_Gorges&oldid=1205445640"