Talk:Fengjia Night Market

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fengjia Night Market article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Taiwan Low‑importance

	Taiwan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Feng Chia Night Market —Preceding unsigned comment added by FCNMCREW (talk • contribs) 08:45, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't the title of the article be "Feng Chia Night Market" since it's named after the school, which is called "Feng Chia University"? Although Pinyin is being used more in Taiwan now, it would seem to make more sense to use the older Wade spelling in this case, otherwise, unless you have working knowledge of Chinese romanization systems, it would be very confusing. S-1-5-7 (talk) 14:30, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. A quick Google search shows that "Feng Chia Night Market" is a way more common spelling than the current "Fengjia Night Market". Unless there is a good reason to keep it at its current spelling, I would support moving renaming the page. -Multivariable (talk) 16:48, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]