Talk:Fenech-Soler

Lineup

I couldn't find a source for these changes and have reverted them. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 11:14, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Fenech-Soler.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Fenech-Soler.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:28, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Surname and band name

There's a problem with this sentence:

A. "The name Fenech-Soler is taken from Daniel Soler's full surname, which is Maltese."

- which keeps getting changed by anonymous editors to this (or something similar):

B. "The name Fenech-Soler is taken from Daniel's Mothers maiden name. He has also chosen to adopt this name rather than use his original surname."

Now this change may well be right; I wouldn't know. But I would ask you to consider, carefully, the following points:

• It keeps getting changed to version B but still has a reference to this: http://www.manchesteracademy.net/Artist%20Pages/fenechsoler.html - which supports version A. You can't really do this - you need a reference which supports version B. To change A to B but leave a reference which supports A is not good editing.

• Sadly, personal knowledge is not considered a reliable source on Wikipedia. This sounds crazy at first - you know something is right, you know the encyclopaedia is wrong - why can't you just change it? Because others need to be able to verify your version, to see for themselves that it is correct. You have to give the information that lets them do this, which is the job that the reference does. I can't verify your personal knowledge.

• The bottom line, under present policies as I understand them is that we are aiming for verifiability, more than truth. Getting both would be best but if it's a choice then verifiability wins. Sounds mad? Possibly, yes. Only way to run a multi-editor encyclopaedia? Possibly, yes.

• If you would like to read more on these issues, they are here: WP:RS on reliable sources and WP:V specifically on verifiability.

To sort this mess out is quite simple - all you need is a verifiable source which supports the new version. Change it back to version B or whatever, give the new verifiable source. You're done. If you are not sure how to format a reference just put it in anyway and someone will sort it out for you.

This will fix it. Just changing it to an unverifiable version and leaving a contradictory source in will not fix it.

Hope this helps

Best wishes DBaK (talk) 15:25, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Media and Press coverage

These are huge quotations. But non of them is references. Removed from page, nut posted here in case some of this can be used back with due references provided wherever necessary.

QUOTE The band have received considerable positive critical appraisal in the UK and US, including major newspapers, music publications and numerous music blogs.

Press:

“A band on the verge of very big things indeed” SUNDAY TIMES
“Dancing to the sound of a very different beat, and they don’t get much more hi-NRG than this.” NME
“Fenech-Soler are heading skyward.” MIXMAG
“We have seen the future of white dancefloor-scorching electro-funk.” TIME OUT
“Walking the line between Modular’s synths and La Roux’s filth-pop.” DAZED & CONFUSED
“The sort of party tunes that Friendly Fires wish they were making, this band are set for seriously big things.” NOTION
“It’s official we’re obsessed with this band, the lovechild of Delphic and Daft Punk.” GRAZIA
"Northants electro-pop outfit deliver on frantic debut." **** Q
"Uncommonly adept at writing high-voltage floorfillers, this debut stakes a claim to being the best recent record of its genre. Huge fun." **** THE GUARDIAN
"It's OK once again to wave the diamante-encrusted flag for pop. Welcomed with open arms" NME
"In 2010 the boys are leading the way, Fenech are four of the best." 8/10 IDJ
"Heavenly choral intros, carnival percussion and lush synth melodies..." METRO
"Fenech-Soler have risen remarkably" **** ATTITUDE
“Drifty vocals and dreamy sounds, Beautiful.” IDJ 8/10
“This is absolutely glorious.” DROWNED IN SOUND
“Inevitably destined for hugeness.” RCRDLBL.com
“Like the best of late-90’s Paris.” DJ UNQUOTE

Pronunciation of name

Do any sources offer the proper pronunciation of the band's name? It's currently missing from the article. --Shawn K. Quinn (talk) 02:18, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fenech-Soler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120416064008/http://www.manchesteracademy.net/Artist%20Pages/fenechsoler.html to http://www.manchesteracademy.net/Artist%20Pages/fenechsoler.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:47, 30 December 2016 (UTC)