Jump to content

Talk:Feminism in the United States

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 August 2019 and 13 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Laurelheiner, Shiragriffith, Elaine Morrishaw, MHulley, Rpeterian.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 31 August 2021 and 16 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Josieml04. Peer reviewers: Hds432.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): CollegeFreshmen.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:17, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Summary table of major feminist goals in the United States

[edit]

This table seems to be original research. Unless someone can produce some sources the say that these particular goals are in fact the major feminist goals in the United States, I think the section should be deleted (or seriously reworked). At the very least, it is misleading, as it implies that there is a single, coherent set of objectives for all feminists in the US, which is very far from reality. Different forms of feminism have different goals. Rather than presenting such an over-simplified view, perhaps this information could be presented in prose with explanations about who, in particular, has campaigned for or supported each goal. Kaldari (talk) 04:47, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Feminism in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everyone! I changed the introduction section of this article but have reversed those changes back to its original state. This time, I just added a few words to a sentence to get rid of the awkward phrasing, so instead of it saying "feminism has massive influences" I added "feminism has had a massive influence." Let me know if you agree or disagree to this change, thank you. CollegeFreshmen (talk) 00:08, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everyone! I just added a couple of sentences in the criticism section of this article introducing intersectionality because this section is referring to how women of color feel excluded from the movement and I wanted to touch base on this topic by introducing and later explaining everything that leads up to intersectionality so I just introduced the topic as a start. Please let me know what you think of my game plan for this section of the article, thank you.CollegeFreshmen (talk) 03:30, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everyone! I would like to contribute to the critique section of this article so this is my plan. Let me know what you think, thank you! I would like to transition from the third-wave feminist time period to modern feminism by adding examples of how women of color have either made progress or are still hindered from the feminism movement. I would also like to mention the concept of intersectionality and then address opposing views that come with it. 1. Intersectionality: I’ve already tried to start this but I would like to transition from black women being excluded to the history of intersectionality. I’ve already introduced how intersectionality was created. Now, I would like quickly give background information on how Crenshaw came up with the term, how it’s benefited women of color and address opposing opinions on the matter. 2. Opposing Views: There are some people who are against the idea of intersectionality and I would like to present those views. 3. Not Just Women of Color: I can’t just talk about black women, I’ll run out of things to say so when I’m done with analyzing intersectionality, I’d like to expand how exclusive the feminist movement is towards the LBGT community and Trans community.CollegeFreshmen (talk) 02:27, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Feminism in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:10, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


MeToo Movement Section

[edit]

MeToo Movement Section Added a section about the MeToo movement Shiragriffith (talk) 23:46, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The TimesUp Now Movement

[edit]

Added a section on the TimesUp Now Movement Shiragriffith (talk) 00:02, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Semitism in Feminism

[edit]

Added a section about anti-Semitism in the movement for the Criticisms section Shiragriffith (talk) 03:02, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reformat

[edit]

I reformatted my section on the MeToo and TimesUp Now movements to clearly show that they are each 21st-Century feminist movements. I also added a section on anti-Semitism in the criticisms section, as there has unfortunately been anti-Semitism in the feminist movement.Shiragriffith (talk) 03:14, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I want to add a section on Christine Blasey Ford, since she is the 21st-Century version of Anita Hill. If anyone has any suggestions on where I should put her section, I would greatly appreciate it! Shiragriffith (talk) 20:55, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A section about Ford probably isn't appropriate in this article. See WP:SCOPE and WP:TOPIC. There is a BLP on Christine Blasey Ford as well as a major section about her in the Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination article. Articles should be specific to their topic rather than containing digressions on other topics. Paisarepa (talk) 23:22, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Criticisms Section

[edit]

Fixed things in the criticism section (gave the other part a subheading, fixed some spacing issues, and linked important terms) Shiragriffith (talk) 03:24, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I worry that the criticism section is now too large -- it is the largest section in the article and may give undue weight to the criticisms. See WP:UNDUE. It could also use more reliable sources and the tone could be made more encyclopedic. I will probably pare this section down in the future if another editor doesn't want to jump on it first. Paisarepa (talk) 18:44, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This section reads more like a scholarly paper than an encyclopedia entry. For example, the Audre Lorde quote, while inspiring and properly sourced, doesn't specifically relate to the issue of diversity (or lack thereof) in feminist discourse. I want to remove the argumentative portions and unsourced claims, but I realize it'll be delicate going. Anyone have any thoughts on how to do this w/o starting an edit war? Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 03:49, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Please read WP:EL before adding external links to this article. External links do not belong in the body of the article. Thanks, Paisarepa (talk) 23:24, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Feminism_in_the_United_States&oldid=1256767665"