Talk:Felley

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Felley article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Nottinghamshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nottinghamshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nottingham and Nottinghamshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NottinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject NottinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject NottinghamshireNottinghamshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge/Redirect to Underwood or Annesley?

I chanced upon this stub whilst doing some superficial work on Sutton in Ashfield and Ashfield District, the latter of which listed Felley in a table of outlying areas - I'd never heard the name.

Whereas habited situations automatically are ascribed Notability, there is no recent confirmation of residences and no references which allude to any other area than Felley Priory.

As there's no content in the present revision worth keeping, and I am suggesting a Redirect to either Underwood, Nottinghamshire or Annesley which would preserve the previous history and keep the past content visible.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 13:58, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Its still a parish in its own right[1] its just that the ONS doesn't generally publish population data of parishes of less than 100 people but even if it wasn't that's not a reason to merge per WP:DEFUNCTS. I've added some content referring to the parish formation and its name origin. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:04, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]