Talk:Fell & Rock Climbing Club

Climbing Low‑importance

	Climbing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climbing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climbing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ClimbingWikipedia:WikiProject ClimbingTemplate:WikiProject ClimbingClimbing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Lancashire and Cumbria Low‑importance

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

What's in a Name?

I did in fact take a little thought before choosing to create the article under the full title, and to set up FRCC as a disambig page. There ARE several other FRCCs, which will now duly appear :-) In my limited experience people refer to it either as FRCC or as the 'Fell and Rock' - or they go straight to the full title (just because it IS so explicit, ... and doesn't presume the reader is English!) - cf National Trust.

But we'll try it Blisco's way... Bob aka Linuxlad 12:54, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names): "Titles should be as simple as possible without being too general." AFAIK there are no other Fell and Rock clubs, unlike National Trusts, and "Fell & Rock Climbing Club" is the name that appears on their logo and how I've always heard it referred to. The general rule is that the article title should be simple and commonly used, then the full name spelt out at the beginning: so the article Bill Clinton begins William Jefferson "Bill" Clinton.... I think "Fell & Rock Climbing Club" is the best compromise between simplicity and specificity, though "Fell & Rock Club" would also be an option. I've created redirects from nearly all the possible forms I could think of anyway.

As for FRCC and disambiguation, the only purpose of dab pages is (or rather should be) to disambiguate between existing articles that would otherwise share a title. In practice they often degenerate into a list of articles and definitions that share only a vague resemblance to the name in question (eg [1]), which is another good reason to leave it as a redirect until such time as another editor may want to create an article entitled "FRCC". --Blisco 13:55, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know this is long past that discussion, but it seems to me that the title should be Fell ans Rock Climbing Club, spelling out the "and". Anyone got an objection to me fixing this? --Bduke (talk) 12:09, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Early History

Added a few comments to give a little texture to the article. Silentrunner 02:25, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Date

My recollection is that either date is justifiable - from memory, the club was announced in late 1906 and had its first AGM in 1907...

Later, this is from FRCC site The club was founded in 1906-07 and the first informal meeting was held at the Sun Inn , Coniston on 11th November 1906 and the first General Meeting at the Wastwater Hotel on 30th March 1907. Bob aka Linuxlad 09:07, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Other senior climbing clubs

Is Yorkshire Ramblers Club formed in 1892 also considered a 'senior' climbing club? Tim P (talk) 16:38, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fell & Rock Climbing Club. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110812094356/http://beta.nwemail.co.uk/news/1.156053 to http://beta.nwemail.co.uk/news/1.156053

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:27, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]