Talk:Felipe Fernández-Armesto

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.

Authenticity check

A search reveals that the phrase "regarded by many" appears in the text. Is the phrase a symptom of a dubious statement? Could a source be quoted instead? Perhaps the "many" could be identified? Might text be edited to more genuinely reflect specific facts?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Wetman (talk • contribs) 00:13, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possible reversion of submission of second "Atlanta" paragraph

Firstly, the stated news article which heads the second paragraph as its source of information is already among the (properly) cited sources included in the original paragraph.

Second, the way the article used for the information in the added paragraph is cited is, according to Wikipedia's guidelines regarding citations, at best questionable in at least a couple of ways, namely

Making a link to a "create a page" for a single news article is not the proper way to cite a source

simply naming the title and date of the article along with the contents of the submission is not the preferred way to cite a source that could just as soon be linked to, and

much of the added paragraph simply reprints the stated article's contents, repeating word-for-word segments of the article, which I suspect violates Wikipedia's guidelines and is borderline plagiaristic unless perhaps explicitly quoting specific statements made by people in the article.

However, the aforementioned are all ultimately moot points anyway because aspects of the first paragraph render the information comprising the second paragraph superfluous--namely that

Fernandez-Armesto did not recognize Leonpacher as an officer of the law

Leonpacher refused to procure his requested credentials proving that he was in fact an officer of the law and therefore in a position to give orders, and

it was furthermore indicated that their account of the events which took place potentially conflict with each other and that at the very least, a "misunderstanding" occurred and ergo

Leonpacher's account does not necessarily amount to what is actually a different "version of the events" which occurred.

I'm subsequently inclined to believe that the edits made to the article should be reverted on the basis that the additional paragraph is not only poorly submitted but also redundant in terms of its information. (This might not be so if officer Leonpacher had his own page on which the submitted information appeared, although I would tend to doubt he warrants having a page about him based on Wikipedia protocol.)Adrigon 05:20, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think I'm in agreement with your thoughts on this one C2r 07:36, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AHA Controversy?

The article says:

Fernández-Armesto became a center of 2007 AHA (American Historical Association) controversy when he was arrested for the crime of jaywalking in Atlanta.

How exactly did this incident make Fernández-Armesto the center of an AHA controversy? -Grammaticus Repairo 02:21, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stop and Identify statutes

Um, I thought the only time one is compelled to produce identification is when operating a motor vehicle? At least according to Stop and Identify statutes. Btyner 02:57, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Felipe Fernández-Armesto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131007134902/http://pulse-berlin.com/index0985.html?id=146 to http://www.pulse-berlin.com/index0985.html?id=146

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:32, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Name

If his father had the exact same name, shouldn't he be ", Jr."? --ExperiencedArticleFixer (talk) 11:22, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]