Talk:Feedback (pork industry)

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 3 November 2023 by reviewer North8000 (talk · contribs).

Animal rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animal rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of animal rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Animal rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Animal rightsTemplate:WikiProject Animal rightsAnimal rights articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Agriculture: Livestock Low‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Livestock task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	It is requested that an image or images be included in this article to improve its quality.

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good start

North8000 (talk) 02:31, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

America only?

Is this allowed / banned, rare / common elsewhere in the world? — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 08:55, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's doesn't seem to be exclusive to the US, but it is a bit more difficult to find sources talking about it outside of the North America. That could also just be that I am not searching for it efficiently

One thing I could find is that it seems the Japanese government generally recommends against its use for PED prevention, but it still occurs there. Article notes at least one specific case where it was used

"Because it is challenging to control feedback and

provide stable results completely, Japanese government

published the PED prevention manual to guide farmers

not to perform feedback unless veterinarians or applic-

able government agencies are involved"

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12985-018-0940-8#Abs1 TB5ivVaO1y55FkAogw1X (talk) 21:24, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@GhostInTheMachine, going back to this, I was able to find some more information about other countries with more complicated boolean searches to look at feedback usage after PEDV in particular .^{[nb 1]}

Its had wide use in at least the US, Taiwan, Japan, South Korea after the 2013 PEDv outbreak. There was wide use in Europe after it PEDv first emerged in the 1970s.

I believe there was also wide use in Canada after the 2013 outbreak, but the sources are unclear. One case study of its use in an Ontario farm called its usage common,^[2] but I couldn't tell if that was for Canada, for North America as a whole, or just generally around the world. There is another source talking about its use on one farm after a PEDv detection in 2019, ^[3] but I again couldn't tell how widespread

I started a section for the article noting what I could find good sourcing for. Will continue to look for more.

I don't think it is banned anywhere from what I can tell. I seem to be always able to find a study looking at least one specific usage of it in just about every country I search for. At best some countries seem to not recommend it, but none seem to prohibit it and it can even be widespread in some of the countries that don't recommend it

—————

^ Like this level of complexity to weed out unrelated results, but to try to keep as many useful results as possible ("controlled exposure" OR "controlled oral exposure" OR "oral controlled exposure") AND ("pig" OR "hog" OR "pork" OR "swine" OR "gilt") AND ("PEDV" OR "Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus" OR "Porcine epidemic diarrhoea" OR "PED") AND "Japan"
^ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4866665/
^ https://www.albertafarmexpress.ca/livestock/officials-continue-all-out-effort-to-prevent-spread-of-ped/

TB5ivVaO1y55FkAogw1X (talk) 04:45, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cite error: There are <ref group=nb> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=nb}} template (see the help page).

[0-1] Like this level of complexity to weed out unrelated results, but to try to keep as many useful results as possible ("controlled exposure" OR "controlled oral exposure" OR "oral controlled exposure") AND ("pig" OR "hog" OR "pork" OR "swine" OR "gilt") AND ("PEDV" OR "Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus" OR "Porcine epidemic diarrhoea" OR "PED") AND "Japan"

[3] ttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4866665/

[4] ttps://www.albertafarmexpress.ca/livestock/officials-continue-all-out-effort-to-prevent-spread-of-ped/

[nb 1]

[2]

[3]