Talk:Federalist No. 6/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 11:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

"The argument" maybe "This argument"?
"He also identifies...war-prone nations" Shouldn't the clause after the comma provide a contrast with the first clause here?
- It doesn't use "but", "however", "although", etc
"Madison used a similar empiricist argument as Hamilton" maybe better as "Madison used an empiricist argument similar to Hamilton's"
Plot summary seems accurate from a reading of the original document.
Images are properly licensed and used.
References are reliable and properly formatted.
Spot-checks:
- "Federalist Essays in Historic Newspapers". Library of Congress. Verifies all claims made.
- Millican, Edward (2014). One United People: The Federalist Papers and the National Idea. University Press of Kentucky. pp. 79–80. Verifies all claims made.
- "Federalist Papers: Primary Documents in American History". Library of Congress. Verifies all claims made.
That's all I have.