Talk:Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland

Switzerland High‑importance

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name

This article was recently moved from Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland to Federal Court of Switzerland. While this is indeed the literal translation of the official DE/FR/IT name, it is not the name used by the federal authorities themselves. The official translation of the Constitution, [1], and the administration's terminology database, [2], all use "Federal Supreme Court". Without objection, I'll move the article back. Sandstein 18:15, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There being no objection, I'm moving it back. Sandstein 20:33, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Federal Supreme Cort of Switzerland ist just wrong. --Sstoffel (talk) 20:59, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but we don't use what's "right", we use what the relevant sources use. Sandstein 21:01, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is no official translation of the federal Constitution. --Île flottante (talk) 22:49, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is, at http://www.admin.ch/ch/e/rs/101/a188.html. I'ts not authoritative, but it's official. Sandstein 23:12, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is irrelevant how the administration fédérale seeks to name the court. The constitution says that the official languages of the Swiss Confederation are French, Italian, and German. Three constitutional references outweigh the way the administration fédérale seeks to call something. English is not an official language of the Swiss Confederation. --Île flottante (talk) 21:27, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, but we have to pick an English name for the article, since we can't use all of the French, Italian, and German names as the article title. So we have to use an English translation of the French, Italian, and German official name. And I suppose the most obvious translation is that used by the federal government itself, including in official publications as in [3]. Moreover, what's relevant is common English usage, per WP:NAME. With 24,000 Google hits, "Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland" is a bit more widely used than "Federal Court of Switzerland". Sandstein 22:13, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130628065858/http://www.lausanne.ch/en/ville-culturelle/histoire-et-patrimoine/architecture-et-monuments/entre-deux-guerres/tribunal-federal.html to http://www.lausanne.ch/en/ville-culturelle/histoire-et-patrimoine/architecture-et-monuments/entre-deux-guerres/tribunal-federal.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:00, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]