Talk:February 2009 lunar eclipse

Astronomy: Moon / Solar System / Eclipses Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Moon task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Eclipses task force.

Photos

I am confused about the first photo. It is labelled 14:38 UTC on Feb. 9th, but that time will not occur for an hour and a half! Helikophis (talk) 13:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's easy to be confused on time zones, at least I don't even know what time is displayed here. But I'm more disappointed on over-exposed photos that don't show anything of the subtle penumbral eclipse. Tom Ruen (talk) 17:43, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, it does look like UT is displayed on the time signatures, so this isn't good! Tom Ruen (talk) 17:45, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the photos, given uncertain times and too poorly exposed to show anything of the event. Tom Ruen (talk) 18:01, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Penumbral Lunar Eclipse February 2009 Argao Cebu.JPG
Observed from Argao, Cebu, Philippines during the height of penumbral lunar eclipse at 14:38 UTC
Image:20090209-25.jpgaFebruary 2009 Penumbral Lunar Eclipse in Olongapo, Philippines (Part 25).jpg
Eclipse observed from the binoculars in Olongapo, Philippines at approximately 14:40 UTC.
Images contributed by Abhijit Tembhekar (Full moon, but not during the penumbral eclipse!)

Full Moon seen from Baltimore County on 9th Feb 2009.
Full Moon seen rising in Baltimore County.
Full Moon seen rising in Baltimore County.

So have we decided what time the eclipse is to be shown?Caitlyn —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.182.251.140 (talk) 02:18, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The times are correct in the article (and the eclipse already occured), but you have to to convert from universal time to local time for a specific location on earth. SockPuppetForTomruen (talk) 04:06, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Online images: SockPuppetForTomruen (talk) 00:18, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Definition of prenumbral

This article does not define prenumbral, nor do I quite see where a definition[1] would be properly inserted. Beyond that, why isn't this called a partial eclipse instead? --DThomsen8 (talk) 14:37, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The lunar eclipse article describes it. I tried a redirect at penumbral lunar eclipse which jumps to the "type" section, although already near the top. A partial eclipse has the moon partially entering the umbral shadow. A penumbral eclipse has the moon entering the penumbral shadow. Technically you can call this a partial penumbral eclipse. Total penumbral lunar eclipses are possible too, but much more rare. SockPuppetForTomruen (talk) 20:08, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Penumbral lunar eclipse 2006 March 14 Warrenton VA.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:25, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Penumbral lunar eclipse 2006 March 14 Warrenton VA.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:37, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]