Talk:Feast (2005 film)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Feast (2005 film) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Feast (2005 film). Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Feast (2005 film) at the Reference desk.

Horror

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Release

Does anyone else think the release dates in the release section have no value? Orracle107 (talk) 19:24, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh, DO any of these characters have real names!203.53.167.180 02:19, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The link to Jenny Wade is wrong. Gaborm 12:50, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plot

This doesn't really outline the plot, or... anything. Just carnage. Is this the way the movie goes, or...? Someone fix it, please. 70.171.209.15 14:30, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

it does —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.247.219.178 (talk) 03:34, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, it doesn't, really. This reads like a run-down of the action in the film. What is the motivation for these events? Why do they occur? And if, as TheOrgg suggests, the film is an homage to Night of the Living Dead, why is this fact not mentioned in the article? Could someone who has seen the film please clean up the language? joshua.green (talk) 11:32, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I haven't actually seen this film, but from what I can tell the plot has barely changed since I made my original note. This bothers me, so I'm going to go ahead and cut out everything like "and she is drenched in blood," or other useless phrases. Methinks we can get a general idea of what this film is and what happens without the extra info. Techfreak98 (talk) 03:32, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Character names

The characters (other than Mewes) have no actual name given, and their 'screenname' is shown in little 'action shots.' Also, the movie is a thematic remake of Night of the Living Dead. After the setup and introduction of the characters (15 minutes or so), it's just beautiful and humourous carnage. -TheOrgg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.79.146.128 (talk) 15:47, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so their 'screenname' must be their character name. That it is not a proper name doesn't mean it isn't their name. The use of scare quotes around the names suggest they have been made up by the author, and are not actually the character's names. joshua.green (talk) 11:32, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wish people would learn how to write english correctly before writing articles. "...After a short breather," WTF? "which then results in the military guy getting killed."?!? Did a tard write this? Also, is it a bar or a pub??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.151.204.210 (talk) 13:49, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And yet you yourself have done nothing to improve it. Thanks. joshua.green (talk) 11:32, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Feast.jpg

Image:Feast.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tone

The tone of this article seems kind of informal. Sort of like, "The military guy then kills the monster, but only after the dude with the wierd hat knocks it on the ground. He rips its head off and the blood sprays all over everything."

I haven't seen the movie, but IMO the plot probably could use a rewrite.

Or is it just me?Techfreak98 (talk) 04:06, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Order of Events

I made repairs to the plot since it listed scenes from the film in the wrong order; I also fixed the bartender's death in the cast list. Shaowstrike (talk) 17:45, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]