Talk:Fawley branch line

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Hampshire

	Hampshire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hampshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hampshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HampshireWikipedia:WikiProject HampshireTemplate:WikiProject HampshireHampshire articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Fawley Branch Line

Legend

					South Western Main Line
					Bournemouth Southampton
					Totton

					Marchwood Closed 14 February 1966
					Marchwood Military Port
					Hythe Pier, Railway and Ferry
					Hythe Closed 14 February 1966
					Fawley Closed 14 February 1966
					Fawley Refinery

Table needs work (work needs table?) Britmax 19:26, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well it works on my userpage - duff copy? Britmax 19:27, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hythe Pier awaits blue seaward end Britmax (talk) 16:09, 7 January 2008 (UTC) Done and sent to article Britmax (talk) 19:42, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you are on the subject of the Hythe Pier Railway, could you just check the template in which i created which is now on Hythe Pier, Railway and Ferry...? Simply south (talk) 21:05, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A good diagram for the Railway and Ferry page. My reason for including the pier was to say yes, this is the same Hythe but the pier railway is not connected to the branch line, look here's an article about it. The water that runs under the pier is Southampton Water at this point, not the Solent, by the way. Britmax (talk) 18:35, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposals that came to nothing

About 75% of the text under reopening proposals describes ancient suggested schemes that have long since been discarded. This is part of the local government process, no doubt, but it is not "notable" to read that someone suggested something in 2015 and nothing came of it. It needs to be pruned.

Incidentally it's hardly proper that all the citations under the history section are from subterranea britannica, an online encyclopaedia. Wikipedia is a tertiary document and should source itself on secondary sources. If Wiki as an online encyclopaedia sources itself entirely from someone else's online encyclopaedia, isn't that a bit, well, unethical? And incestuous?Afterbrunel (talk) 14:24, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]