Talk:Fawdon
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Updating the page
[edit]As the current page is poorly written, poorly laid out, unsourced, and effectively copy/pasted from the Newcastle council website I'm planning to replace it with a more suitable page. I've added new sections, sourced as much material as possible, removed the statistics and figures that have no source, and hopefully made it more conforming to Wikipedia guidelines. You can see my version of the page by clicking my username.--Coliliqui (talk) 02:21, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
- I got caught up in other things and never got around to finishing the page, but it looks better now than it used to... kinda. Well, nevermind. Carry on. Coliliqui (talk) 15:03, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Fawdon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070323085352/http://www.newcastle.gov.uk/core.nsf/a/wardinfofawdon to http://www.newcastle.gov.uk/core.nsf/a/wardinfofawdon
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070323085412/http://www.newcastle.gov.uk/core.nsf/a/infofawdon to http://www.newcastle.gov.uk/core.nsf/a/infofawdon
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:19, 4 December 2017 (UTC)