Talk:Faust (1926 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the German cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Silent films task force.
	This article is on the project's core list.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:F. W. Murnau - Faust.jpg

Image:F. W. Murnau - Faust.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:23, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Faust 1926.jpg

Image:Faust 1926.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 10:47, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The two non-free images are no longer used in this article. Deanlaw (talk) 00:40, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Better quality scan of poster

available here: http://www.bundesarchiv.de/aktuelles/aus_dem_archiv/galerie/00040/index.html?index=0&id=0&nr=5# --93.133.226.21 (talk) 18:41, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Faust (1926 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:24, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source for reviews

Tons of reviews are mentioned in Kevin J. Harty, The Reel Middle Ages, 1999. 9781476608433

https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Reel_Middle_Ages/Ow5eCgAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=murnau's%20faust%20review&pg=PA90&printsec=frontcover&bsq=murnau's%20faust%20review — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymous-232 (talk • contribs) 06:01, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously affected studio shooting

"Faust seriously affected studio shooting and special effects techniques. Murnau uses two cameras, both filming multiple shots; many scenes were filmed time and again."

Using two cameras (or more) was standard procedure in the 1920s, both in Europe and in the U.S. (see any Chaplin or Griffith biography). This yielded double negatives, with slightly different angles, and the worse shots would be used for export prints. As for "many scenes were filmed time and again", this was also standard procedure from the 1910s and on. So what's the point of that sentence? It certainly doesn't illustrate "seriously affected studio shooting".

"Both filming multiple shots" - what does that even mean? How could two cameras not film multiple shots? 2A02:AA1:102B:BC72:A0A9:7B30:8BEC:FB7F (talk) 15:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]