Jump to content

Talk:Fatimah bint Asad

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

This article is POV and need cleanup, its not Copyrighted.

I just Copypasted the whole thing since most of it is relevant, and all of it is generally accepted, exept for the "you son, you son" bit. So its factual accurat, but needs NPOVing and to be cleaned upp.

Anyone wants to help?

--Striver 4 July 2005 01:42 (UTC)


Couple of questions:
  • 1. What does the privilege of eating the fruits of heaven mean?
  • 2. Why is O MARY (MIRIAM)! LEAVE THE BAITU'L-MUQADDAS, SINCE IT IS THE PLACE OF WORSHIP AND NOT OF CHILDBIRTH in caps? freestylefrappe July 4, 2005 23:33 (UTC)


1 No idea, just delet it
2 It was a headline, just uncap it if you feel for it. this article needs heavy copyediting.
--Striver 5 July 2005 00:30 (UTC)
1 It is a wide view among Shia Muslims and among some Sunni Muslims that the whole "Virgins in Heaven" issue is misunderstood, and that the correct translations is really "grapes" ("fruit"). Armyrifle 20:04, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

great!

[edit]

Good work, Freestylefrappe. Now it needs al "hazrat" and "(saw)" to be removed :D


--Striver 5 July 2005 02:02 (UTC)


[edit]

Please explain here why this content is not copyrighted to the original author. --nixie 01:37, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

things arent copyrighted by default, it must be stated. And it doesnt in this case. --Striver 07:32, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
That hasen't been true in most countries for many years.--Duk 16:12, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Duk, I provided a list of copyright resources to Striver on his talk page a few days ago. I haven't heard back, so far. Hopefully that will help. JesseW 00:26, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I reverted the last two edits as they are the same copyvio as before. There appears to be minimal (any?) rewording...I found this right away with the search term "bore the brunt of all sorts of catastrophes". freestylefrappe 00:05, July 30, 2005 (UTC)
This page was not copied from another website. Website #1 and website #2, so can you kindly tell me who copied from whom. This is not the first I am seeing this other article that I have started, other editors believe that they are copied from another website but that is not true. I am a Shi’a and Shi’as don’t tell different things about Islam and Muslims individuals. Those articles are also written by Shi’a Muslims ( I am not sure) and that’s which ever website they got their information from was also written by a Shi’a, so that is the reason information is same on all three article. So can you please tell me which website copied from which website and when you solve this problem, I will give you more websites that contain the same information about Bibi Fatima binte Asad (AS). Thank you--Salman 16:28, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts made by tickle me

[edit]

Tickle me, bint is not a word in Arabic. Bint is incorrect since it leaves out the –e- from binte. See this page and it is on wikipedia, it has the right spelling of binte. And I don’t understand why the page is being reverted. Wikipedians should discuss the issue before they revert and they should carry out the action when a decision has been finalized. Thank You--Salman 15:17, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

POV

[edit]

... Her grandsons, second Shi’a Imam Hassan ibn Ali and third Shi’a Imam Hussain ibn Ali are to be the leaders of the youths of Paradise ... ?! Guys, this is an encyclopaedia! Tājik 00:59, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Encyclopedic style and possible copyvio

[edit]

I've reverted a rather lengthy addition, consisting of over a dozen paragraphs taken almost verbatim from Great Women of Islam: Who were given the good News of Paradise (online at kalamullah.com). There's no copyright notice on the book at the website, but I don't believe that necessarily means that it's not copyrighted.

In any case, the style of the copied passage is non-encyclopedic and fails WP:NPOV. If material from the book is used as a source for this article, it should be rewritten to avoid any possibility of copyvio, and to give it the tone of an encyclopedia article rather than a hagiography. Ammodramus (talk) 02:58, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First Hashimite to give birth to a Hashimite?

[edit]

I reverted this strange edit. I hope it is not a problem.Ghazaalch (talk) 04:14, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]