Talk:Fatahillah

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fatahillah article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Military history: Biography C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force

Weird

This is one of the most weirdly biased articles I've seen, which is strange seeing as he's over 600 years old. The Portuguese didn't own Kalapa, the Sundanese just had an alliance with them. Demak never owned Kalapa, so saying he "reconquered" it is delusional. Even if it's looking at it from a Javanese cultural standpoint, no Muslim or non-Sundanese people had ruled Kalapa before this time. Fatahillah invaded Kalapa, burned it to the ground, and founded Jakarta. I get why people would want a better origin story than that, but I don't think they're going to get one.

Conkaeso (talk) 23:43, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]