Talk:Fat comma

It's a start dot Tom 04:50, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Crap. it appears under "Fat Comma", not Fat comma as the wiki search would have it. How to move?dot Tom 05:24, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fat arrow redirecting here is kind of confusing, given that it is actually an arrow, not a comma. --Tgr (talk) 13:52, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fat comma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110625034400/http://logicalfriday.com:80/2011/06/20/i-dont-like-the-ruby-1-9-hash-syntax/ to http://logicalfriday.com/2011/06/20/i-dont-like-the-ruby-1-9-hash-syntax/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:20, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The term "fat comma" was invented in Algol-60

This article fails to acknowledge that term "fat comma" was coined for an Algol-60 feature. Actual parameters in a function call could be separated either by an actual comma: conj(1,2) or a "fat comma" constituting an explanatory comment about the subsequent argument: conj(1):imaginary part(2).

References:

AHMartin (talk) 04:20, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have added information about ALGOL 60. DWorley (talk) 21:02, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]