Talk:Fat Farm
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Image copyright problem with Image:OSCMapsMirror.jpg
[edit]The image Image:OSCMapsMirror.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:38, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Notable?
[edit]A plot summary is not an article. This article gives no sources, reliable or otherwise, to suggest that the story itself is notable. Either such sources should be added, or the article should be deleted or merged. Guy who reads a lot (talk) 22:49, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
Quick Delete proposed
[edit]I am tagging this for quick delete. No reason has been advanced to suggest that this short story is notable (although the author is notable). Guy who reads a lot (talk) 19:50, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- Non-notablity is not a valid CSD category for a book or short story -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:34, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- OK, I changed the tag to "proposed deletion" instead of quick deletion. Guy who reads a lot (talk) 22:28, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- It may not be notable but it's memorable - I remembered the story and was trying to figure out the name of the story and was Googling things like "man who clones himself and his old body is sent to work"...eventually finding this name after a long time looking. I wouldn't have bothered if it wasn't that memorable. Hardly the best reason to keep it, but it is one.Escottf (talk) 22:58, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
- OK, I changed the tag to "proposed deletion" instead of quick deletion. Guy who reads a lot (talk) 22:28, 3 January 2012 (UTC)