Talk:Fantasy Black Channel/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hello Rafablu88. I'll be reviewing this article per your request. I should be finished by Saturday if not earlier. Timmeh!_{(review me)} 01:42, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Cheers. I don't envisage any problems that would leave it hanging until or after Saturday. I've gone over and over with a fine comb. I might send it for FA review after. Fingers crossed. Off to bed now (UK time). Enjoy the read. Rafablu88 (talk) 01:49, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Checklist and analysis

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   As with every GA nominee I've reviewed, I've had to fix some minor formatting and grammatical errors, but there was nothing major.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   These are all good for GA.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Talks about all the major aspects of the album: its history, musical style, reception, release, etc.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I'm passing this for GA, as it complies with all the requirements. Good luck taking it to FA. Timmeh!_{(review me)} 15:43, 23 May 2009 (UTC)