Talk:Fan Brycheiniog

This article is within the scope of WikiProject British and Irish hills, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the hills and mountains of Great Britain and Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British and Irish hillsWikipedia:WikiProject British and Irish hillsTemplate:WikiProject British and Irish hillsBritish and Irish hills articles

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New results added

I have added an external link by Dyfed Archaeology reporting the Fan Foel excavation results. I have also reverted strange image sizes from another editor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.52.9.44 (talk) 07:05, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

They were not "strange image sizes". I amended it to use the default image size instead of a forced image size, in accordance with MOS:IMAGES#Size and WP:IMGSIZE. Your use of 300px goes against both of these. --Redrose64 (talk) 11:16, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The WP advice is what it says: advisory only and not mandatory. In my opinion, subsidiary images should adopt the size of the leading image. 31.52.9.44 (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.142.218.17 (talk) 13:17, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Someone has just deleted my new text and ignored the external link to the paper on the barrow on Fan Foel. I have restored the text.[[User talk:31.52.9.44|talk] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.154.61.250 (talk) 21:50, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]