Talk:Family of Mahatma Gandhi

This article was nominated for deletion on 30 October 2019. The result of the discussion was keep.

India: History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in February 2022.

Genealogy Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Genealogy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Genealogy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GenealogyWikipedia:WikiProject GenealogyTemplate:WikiProject GenealogyGenealogy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Title

User:RegentsPark thanks for renaming it to The family of Mahatma Gandhi. How about the title Mahatma Gandhi Family ? which type is more prevalent? --DBig Xrayᗙ 15:01, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I'll let this sit here for a couple of days in case there are objections. If not, I'll move it again. --regentspark (comment) 16:23, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi team, Could you please check the only photo/ image shown in the description summary of Mahatma Gandhi I think that photo is either fake or photoshoped. Don't know but that's not something legitimate. it should be corrected asap. 42.108.163.108 (talk) 20:03, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox rules for inclusion of relatives

@Shaan Sengupta: Is there a policy basis for your deleting "names with no wikipedia page" from the infobox? If yes, please provide links and quotations.

I can see why such a policy (if it exists) might make sense for descendants. But I am not convinced it makes sense for people like his great-great-great-great-grandfather (with patrilineal descent).-- Toddy1 (talk) 21:29, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Toddy1 I don't remember when and on which page but a senior editor once reverted my edit saying that we should not add names of the people who don't have their articles since they are non-notable. And yes it was for the name of the son. I think you are right in your second paragraph. Maybe I should have enquired him about this. I did what I was told once. You can revert if it's wrong. I leave it to you to decide. Because you are much experienced. Anyways my suggestion is that we can keep away those name as they are mentioned in the family tree image. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 11:24, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Articles on cities often have a section with a title like "Notable people" (for instance: Faizabad#Notable people). We do not allow the addition of names to such sections if there is no article associated with those names.-- Toddy1 (talk) 11:52, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok @Toddy1. Thanks for correcting my information. It surely will benefit me here. I leave it to you to do what you think is right. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 11:57, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Toddy1 One more thing that I just saw. What I removed was all added by an IP. Means those things were not present before. Take this into consideration. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 11:58, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]