Talk:Family Law Reform Act 1969

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 2 May 2022 by reviewer HitroMilanese (talk · contribs).

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Possible copyright violation

Hi @HitroMilanese:, First of all I would like to remind you that I am not following your action. According to this copyvios report, I see the problem of copyvios that particular url is here but I didn't find this url in the references list. Would you please look after it? , Thank you! Fade258 (talk) 08:12, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Fade258

Firstly, that is the long title of the act that is showing violation which shouldn't be written otherwise. Secondly, see this and the bottom of the URL under consideration. Thanks. Hitro talk 08:36, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for kind message! Fade258 (talk) 08:41, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]